Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill internal-investigationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/internal-investigation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/internal-investigation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/internal-investigation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/internal-investigation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/internal-investigation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.03096 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01548 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00619 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00310 |
Grade A, and why
Internal Investigation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 147 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Internal Investigation
Purpose
Provide structured workflow support for an attorney-directed internal investigation. The skill helps track evidentiary coverage as documents and interview notes arrive, surface gaps between gathered evidence and the issues in scope, connect evidence to each issue, and draft a privileged investigation memorandum with audience-specific summaries. All output is draft legal work product for attorney review — not legal advice, not a disciplinary decision, and not a privilege guarantee.
Use When
- An attorney is directing an internal investigation into employee misconduct, workplace complaints, financial irregularities, executive conduct, or whistleblower allegations and needs a structured framework to organize evidence and draft findings.
- An attorney or HR professional needs to track evidentiary coverage across documents and interview notes and identify what has not yet been gathered.
- A draft investigation memorandum needs to be assembled from gathered facts, organized by issue rather than by witness.
- Audience-specific summaries (HR, leadership/board, outside counsel) need to be drafted from a completed investigation record.
- The user needs a privileged, attorney-ready work product structure for an ongoing or completed investigation.
Required Inputs
- Allegation summary: the nature of the conduct at issue, the individual(s) alleged to have engaged in it (respondent identifier), the individual(s) who reported it (complainant identifier, if applicable), and the relevant timeframe.
- Investigation type: HR/workplace conduct, financial irregularity, executive misconduct, whistleblower retaliation, or other. If unclear, describe and flag.
- Attorney-direction confirmation: whether a supervising attorney has formally directed the investigation for the purpose of obtaining legal advice. If not confirmed, see the privilege-formation gate in the Workflow.
- Workforce and organizational context: whether the workforce is unionized, whether the employer is a public-sector entity, and any other structural facts bearing on applicable rules. If unknown, flag with
[CONFIRM: workforce/organizational context]. - Gathered materials: documents, communications, policies, and interview notes received to date. These may be provided incrementally as the investigation proceeds.
- Prior summaries or memos: any investigation summary, prior draft memo, or interim report already prepared.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 147 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 252244131186
Internal Investigation is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 3,096 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…
aenderungsvorbehalt-308
Für Änderungsvorbehalt 308: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.