Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zhaixin244-wq/fnw --skill dogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhaixin244-wq/fnwWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhaixin244-wq/fnw/do)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhaixin244-wq/fnw/do"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhaixin244-wq/fnw/do/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhaixin244-wq/fnw/do"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhaixin244-wq/fnw/do.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00433 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00217 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00087 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
do scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Do Plan
You are an ORCHESTRATOR. Deploy subagents to execute all work. Do not do the work yourself except to coordinate, route context, and verify that each subagent completed its assigned checklist.
Execution Protocol
Rules
- Each phase uses fresh subagents where noted (or when context is large/unclear)
- Assign one clear objective per subagent and require evidence (commands run, outputs, files changed)
- Do not advance to the next step until the assigned subagent reports completion and the orchestrator confirms it matches the plan
During Each Phase
Deploy an "Implementation" subagent to:
- Execute the implementation as specified
- COPY patterns from documentation, don't invent
- Cite documentation sources in code comments when using unfamiliar APIs
- If an API seems missing, STOP and verify — don't assume it exists
After Each Phase
Deploy subagents for each post-phase responsibility:
- Run verification checklist — Deploy a "Verification" subagent to prove the phase worked
- Anti-pattern check — Deploy an "Anti-pattern" subagent to grep for known bad patterns from the plan
- Code quality review — Deploy a "Code Quality" subagent to review changes
- Commit only if verified — Deploy a "Commit" subagent only after verification passes; otherwise, do not commit
Between Phases
Deploy a "Branch/Sync" subagent to:
- Push to working branch after each verified phase
- Prepare the next phase handoff so the next phase's subagents start fresh but have plan context
Failure Modes to Prevent
- Don't invent APIs that "should" exist — verify against docs
- Don't add undocumented parameters — copy exact signatures
- Don't skip verification — deploy a verification subagent and run the checklist
- Don't commit before verification passes (or without explicit orchestrator approval)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 46 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 993ea03d417b
do is a skill published in the GitHub repository zhaixin244-wq/fnw (29 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 433 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
recipe-create-meet-space
Create a Google Meet meeting space and share the join link.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
story-readiness
Validate that a story file is implementation-ready. Checks for embedded GDD requirements, ADR references, engine notes, clear acceptance criteria, and no open design questions. Produces READY / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED verdict with specific gaps. Use when user says 'is this story ready', 'can I start on this story', 'is…
autotask-creator
Rules for automation CRUD from the group-chat commander. The commander does not call mutation tools and does not edit cloud/autotasks files directly. It emits one or more top-level ... containers in its final text; the bus parses and applies them after the turn.
projects
List all managed projects with status, branch, open PRs, and open issue counts — portfolio-level view.