Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zhaixin244-wq/fnw --skill requesting-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhaixin244-wq/fnwWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhaixin244-wq/fnw/requesting-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhaixin244-wq/fnw/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhaixin244-wq/fnw/requesting-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhaixin244-wq/fnw/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhaixin244-wq/fnw/requesting-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00823 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00411 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00165 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00082 |
Grade A, and why
requesting-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- requesting-code-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
请求代码审查
派遣 superpowers:code-reviewer 子代理来在问题扩散之前发现它们。审查者获得的是精心组织的评估上下文——绝不是你的会话历史。这样可以让审查者专注于工作成果而非你的思考过程，同时保留你自己的上下文以便继续工作。
核心原则： 早审查，勤审查。
何时请求审查
必须审查：
- 子代理驱动开发中每个任务完成后
- 完成重要功能后
- 合并到 main 之前
可选但有价值：
- 卡住时（换个视角）
- 重构之前（建立基线）
- 修复复杂 bug 之后
如何请求
1. 获取 git SHA：
BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) # 或 origin/main
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
2. 派遣 code-reviewer 子代理：
使用 Task 工具，指定 superpowers:code-reviewer 类型，填写 code-reviewer.md 中的模板
占位符说明：
{WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED}- 你刚完成的内容{PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS}- 预期功能{BASE_SHA}- 起始提交{HEAD_SHA}- 结束提交{DESCRIPTION}- 简要说明
3. 处理反馈：
- Critical 问题立即修复
- Important 问题在继续之前修复
- Minor 问题记录下来稍后处理
- 如果审查者有误，用技术理由反驳
示例
[刚完成任务 2：添加验证功能]
你：让我在继续之前请求代码审查。
BASE_SHA=$(git log --oneline | grep "Task 1" | head -1 | awk '{print $1}')
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
[派遣 superpowers:code-reviewer 子代理]
WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: 会话索引的验证和修复功能
PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: docs/superpowers/plans/deployment-plan.md 中的任务 2
BASE_SHA: a7981ec
HEAD_SHA: 3df7661
DESCRIPTION: 添加了 verifyIndex() 和 repairIndex()，支持 4 种问题类型
[子代理返回]:
优点：架构清晰，测试真实
问题：
Important：缺少进度指示器
Minor：报告间隔使用了魔法数字 (100)
评估：可以继续
你：[修复进度指示器]
[继续任务 3]
与工作流的集成
子代理驱动开发：
- 每个任务完成后审查
- 在问题叠加之前发现它们
- 修复后再进入下一个任务
执行计划：
- 每批（3 个任务）后审查
- 获取反馈，修复，继续
临时开发：
- 合并前审查
- 卡住时审查
红线
绝不要：
- 因为"很简单"就跳过审查
- 忽略 Critical 问题
- 带着未修复的 Important 问题继续推进
- 对合理的技术反馈进行争辩
如果审查者有误：
- 用技术理由反驳
- 展示证明其可行的代码/测试
- 要求澄清
参见模板：requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 106 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 81216a29c01e
requesting-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository zhaixin244-wq/fnw (28 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 823 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
engram-branch-pr
PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.
verify-behavior
Verify or reproduce visible product behavior by driving the real UI with pi-computer-use's checked tools, requiring verified expect postconditions and durable state evidence for meaningful UI flows. Use when triage needs visual reproduction, implementation needs behavioral proof, review needs interactive confirmation…
github-contributor
End-to-end playbook for shipping high-quality pull requests to open-source projects you don't maintain — discovery, CONTRIBUTING compliance, PR-size check, minimal-diff implementation, PR description with AI-assisted disclosure, conflict resolution, and post-submission maintainer interaction. Use whenever creating…
revdiff
Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…
write-pr
Reference standards for writing pull request titles and descriptions in the tldraw repository, plus the pre-flight comment sweep over the diff. Use as supporting guidance when another skill or workflow needs PR content standards, not as the user-facing create/update PR workflow.