Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Zhang-Henry/CoEvoSkills --skill evo-python-fuzzinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Zhang-Henry/CoEvoSkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhang-henry/coevoskills/evo-python-fuzzing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhang-henry/coevoskills/evo-python-fuzzing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhang-henry/coevoskills/evo-python-fuzzing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhang-henry/coevoskills/evo-python-fuzzing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhang-henry/coevoskills/evo-python-fuzzing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00914 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00457 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00183 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00091 |
Grade A, and why
evo-python-fuzzing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 132 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Python Coverage-Guided Fuzzing Skill
This skill automates the setup and execution of coverage-guided fuzzing for Python libraries using Atheris (Google's Python fuzzing engine backed by libFuzzer).
Workflow
- Discover Python libraries in a base directory
- Analyze each library to find good fuzz targets (parsers, deserializers, formatters)
- Generate notes_for_testing.txt with analysis results
- Generate fuzz.py drivers with proper Atheris instrumentation
- Setup virtual environments with dependencies
- Run fuzzers with time budget and capture logs
- Validate fuzz logs for successful completion
Key Concepts
- Atheris bridges Python to libFuzzer for coverage-guided fuzzing
- Fuzz drivers must instrument target imports before calling them
- TestOneInput accepts bytes, uses FuzzedDataProvider for structured data
- libFuzzer output goes to stderr; capture it for the log
- Good targets: parsers, deserializers, formatters accepting string/bytes input
- For large libraries, import only the specific submodule to avoid slow startup
- Catch expected exceptions so fuzzer only reports unexpected crashes
Usage
import sys
sys.path.insert(0, '/app/environment/skills/evo-python-fuzzing/scripts')
from utils import run_all, validate_all
# End-to-end: discover, analyze, generate, setup, fuzz, validate
results = run_all(
base_dir='/app',
libraries_file='/app/libraries.txt',
timeout=10
)
# Validate all artifacts exist and logs are valid
all_ok = validate_all('/app', '/app/libraries.txt')
print(f"All OK: {all_ok}")
Individual Functions
import sys
sys.path.insert(0, '/app/environment/skills/evo-python-fuzzing/scripts')
from utils import (
discover_libraries,
write_libraries_file,
analyze_library,
generate_notes,
write_notes,
generate_fuzz_driver,
write_fuzz_driver,
setup_venv,
run_fuzzer,
validate_fuzz_log,
)
# Step 1: Discover libraries
libs = discover_libraries('/app')
write_libraries_file(libs, '/app/libraries.txt')
# Step 2: Analyze and write notes
for lib_path in libs:
info = analyze_library(lib_path)
notes = generate_notes(info)
write_notes(lib_path, notes)
# Step 3: Generate fuzz drivers
for lib_path in libs:
info = analyze_library(lib_path)
driver = generate_fuzz_driver(info)
write_fuzz_driver(lib_path, driver)
# Step 4: Setup virtual environments
for lib_path in libs:
setup_venv(lib_path)
# Step 5: Run fuzzers
for lib_path in libs:
success, log = run_fuzzer(lib_path, timeout=10)
validation = validate_fuzz_log(f"{lib_path}/fuzz.log")
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 132 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 332d3bab148e
evo-python-fuzzing is a skill published in the GitHub repository Zhang-Henry/CoEvoSkills (66 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 914 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.