Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to zhanglongxiao111/indesign-cli. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhanglongxiao111/indesign-cli/master/.codex/skills/chatgpt-pro-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhanglongxiao111/indesign-cliWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhanglongxiao111/indesign-cli/chatgpt-pro-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhanglongxiao111/indesign-cli/chatgpt-pro-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhanglongxiao111/indesign-cli/chatgpt-pro-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhanglongxiao111/indesign-cli/chatgpt-pro-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhanglongxiao111/indesign-cli/chatgpt-pro-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.01305 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00652 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00261 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00130 |
Grade A, and why
chatgpt-pro-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ChatGPT Pro Review
Overview
这是 SA-AIAPP 项目级技能。目标是通过已连接的 GitHub 仓库向 ChatGPT Pro 询问第二意见。GPT Pro 是比主 Agent 更强的审查模型；给它清晰目标和边界，让它自主选择查看路径并充分发挥。
Scope
- 仓库：
zhanglongxiao111/SA-AIAPP - 默认分支：当前本地分支，通常是
dev - 外部咨询归档根目录（本机绝对路径）：
D:/AI/SA-AIAPP/docs/AI协作/外部咨询/进行中/ - 外部咨询归档根目录（仓库相对路径）：
docs/AI协作/外部咨询/进行中/ - 单次咨询目录：
docs/AI协作/外部咨询/进行中/YYYY-MM-DD_<主题>/ - 优先让它看 GitHub 分支或提交，不优先上传 ZIP。
- ChatGPT 只提供建议。重要结论必须回到本地代码核实。
- 不把一次审查的关注点固化成默认流程。按用户当次目标组织提示词。
Workflow
- 先确认本地分支和提交：
git branch --show-currentgit rev-parse --short HEADgit status --short --branch
- 如果有未提交改动，说明 GPT Pro 看不到，除非先推送或单独贴给它。
- 只通过 Browser 技能打开 ChatGPT。用户需要登录时再显式显示浏览器。
- 必须确认模型是
Pro/Pro 进阶。如果当前不是 Pro，不要发送审查请求。 - 优先使用 GitHub 连接器。只有仓库不可用时才考虑小范围 ZIP。
- 发中文只读审查请求。必须包含仓库、分支、提交、目标范围、项目规则和输出格式。
- 不打断正在生成的回答。不得点停止、不得追问、不得改写请求；只被动等待。
- 回答完成后，先落文档，再向用户总结；并在本地核实具体代码结论后再建议改动。
Documents
每次正式询问 GPT Pro 后，必须把问题和回复保存到外部咨询目录，不能只留在网页里。用户口语说“外部调研目录”时，也按本仓库现有的 docs/AI协作/外部咨询/进行中/ 理解。
目录格式：
D:/AI/SA-AIAPP/docs/AI协作/外部咨询/进行中/YYYY-MM-DD_<主题>/
仓库内相对路径为：
docs/AI协作/外部咨询/进行中/YYYY-MM-DD_<主题>/
文件格式：
提问_<主题>.md
回复_<主题>_GPTPro.md
文档要求：
提问文件记录背景、目标、仓库分支、提交、实际发送给 GPT Pro 的提示词。回复文件记录页面可见的 GPT Pro 结论；如果只整理摘要，必须说明不是完整原文。回复文件要写清：这是外部模型意见，后续采纳前必须回到本地代码核实。- 中文文档用 UTF-8 写入；写完后用 UTF-8 复读抽查。
Prompt Template
使用中文提示词。避免过拟合，不要把上一次任务的文件名、模块名或结论硬塞进新请求：
请使用已连接的 GitHub 应用审查 `zhanglongxiao111/SA-AIAPP` 仓库，分支 `<branch>`，提交 `<commit>`。
目标：<用户本次要审查的问题或范围>。
请先阅读根目录 `AGENTS.md`，再查看真实代码。你是更强的审查模型，请自主决定应深入查看哪些文件、数据流和边界，不要只按我列出的路径机械搜索。不要修改代码。
请用中文输出：
1. 结论。
2. 实际查看到的关键模块和数据流。
3. 有证据的问题清单，按严重程度排序，并给出文件路径或代码依据。
4. 如果需要调整，给出更优雅的目标架构；如果现状合理，也明确说明哪些部分不该动。
5. 渐进调整计划，避免大爆炸重构。
6. 风险与验证。
不要泛泛而谈。没有证据的判断请标明不确定，或不要写。
如果用户明确要求画布架构审查，可以追加关注点，但不要把它们当成唯一范围：
- 图片入口中心
- 程序化场景写入中心
- 保存协调和回写边界
- 文件身份 -> 画布身份 -> 图片身份
customData兼容 helper- 图片几何中心
- legacy bridge 和 fallback
Guardrails
- 不用 Windows 全局按键发送。它会影响用户当前操作。
- 不把密钥、
.env、令牌、本地私有文件发给 ChatGPT。 - 不把 GPT Pro 当最终真相。本地代码和
AGENTS.md优先。 - 用户给了窄范围时，不发散成全仓库审查；用户要求架构判断时，也不要把提示词写成代码搜索清单。
- 如果 ChatGPT 因请求太大卡住，先等；需要缩小范围时先告诉用户。
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 106 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A c4723ac307e4
chatgpt-pro-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository zhanglongxiao111/indesign-cli (45 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 1,305 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
swarm-pr-review
Run a graph-guided, tool-augmented PR review using context packing, parallel exploration, mandatory repository-agnostic risk-family coverage with dispatch scaled to diff size and risk, independent reviewer validation, critic challenge, and metrics writeback. Use for deep pull request review with low false-positive…
include-test-files-that-assert-on-behavior-being-changed-in-decl
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
deep-dive
Full execution protocol for MODE: DEEPDIVE — read-only codebase audit with parallel explorer waves, 2 independent reviewers, and sequential critic challenge for HIGH/CRITICAL findings. Loaded on demand by the architect when the deep-dive command emits a [MODE: DEEPDIVE ...] signal.
critic-gate
Full execution protocol for MODE: CRITIC-GATE -- plan critic review, revision loops, and hard stop before execution.
swarm-pr-feedback
Codex adapter for closing known PR feedback in any repository. Use when asked to address pasted review feedback, GitHub review comments or threads, requested changes, CI/check failures, merge conflicts, stale PR branches, or follow-up work that must verify and close all known PR issues.
codebase-review-swarm
Codex adapter for running a rigorous, quote-grounded codebase review or security/QA/accessibility/performance/AI-slop/enhancement audit. Use for full-repo or large-subsystem review reports; not for normal implementation.