Reverse Skill is a routing package for AI coding agents that selects appropriate reverse-engineering, penetration-testing, and security-research methods and tools for a given target. It is used for tasks involving APKs, binaries, frontend JavaScript, packet captures, CTF challenges, and authorized penetration testing. Its catalogue add-ons provide the skills and instructions that guide these workflows.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill --skill windows-adgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhaoxuya520/reverse-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill/windows-ad)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill/windows-ad"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill/windows-ad/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill/windows-ad"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill/windows-ad.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket warn
- Snyk fail
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high YARA Match · line 3 YARA rule matched a hack tool or exploit indicator (offensive tools, reconnaissance, privilege escalation, or exploit frameworks).Fix: Remove offensive tool references and exploit code. Legitimate agent skills should not contain penetration testing tools, exploit frameworks, or reconnaissance utilities.
- high YARA Match · line 52 YARA rule matched a known malware signature (reverse shell, backdoor, ransomware, C2 framework, or info stealer).Fix: Remove the malware payload or compromised file entirely. Investigate how it entered the skill and audit all other artifacts for additional indicators of compromise.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00788 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00394 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00158 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
windows-ad scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- windows-ad — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- windows-ad — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
Windows / Active Directory Security
ACTION REQUIRED（读完后立刻执行）
NOW: 读取../field-journal/precedent-pentest.mdNOW: 域/AD 测试必须明确授权范围（含 DC、是否允许投毒/中继）NOW: case-init；network_profile 与禁止动作写清NEXT: tool-index（impacket/certipy/bloodhound 等常手动）ACT: 从身份枚举与 BloodHound 图开始，不先上破坏性利用
适用场景
- 域渗透、Kerberoasting、AS-REP、委派
- AD CS（ESC1–ESC8 等）证书攻击
- BloodHound / SharpHound 攻击路径
- NTLM Relay / Coercer 强制认证
- 本地提权到域路径（Potato 等作为跳板）
与 attack-chain 关系
- 多阶段从外网到域控 → PRIMARY 可仍是
attack-chain/，本 skill 为 AD 专科 - 已在域内专注身份 → PRIMARY = 本 skill
工作流
1. 枚举
# 示例 Impacket / 内置（需凭据与授权）
nxc smb <range> -u user -p pass
bloodhound-python -d domain.local -u user -p pass -c All -ns <DC>
2. 常见路径（先图后枪）
□ Kerberoast / AS-REP → 离线破解
□ ACL 滥用（GenericAll/WriteDacl）
□ 委派（非约束/约束/基于资源）
□ AD CS 模板错误 → Certipy
□ 中继：LLMNR/NBT-NS + ntlmrelayx（确认授权）
3. 凭证与横向
□ secretsdump / lsassy / mimikatz（严格授权与清理）
□ PtH / PtT / 黄金票仅在授权红队范围
□ 每步写 Evidence；高危等用户确认
工具链
| 工具 | 用途 |
|---|---|
| BloodHound / SharpHound | 路径图 |
| Certipy | AD CS |
| Impacket / NetExec | 横向与枚举 |
| Rubeus / Mimikatz | 票据与凭证（授权） |
| Coercer / Responder | 强制认证 / 投毒 |
参考
references/ad-attack-paths.md../pentest-tools/references/network-attack-defense.md../attack-chain/- seeds:
field-journal/seed-005_ad-certipy-esc1.mdseed-007_ntlm-relay-coercer.mdseed-013_kerberoasting-spn.md
路由上下文
上游: MASTER R24
下游: 报告 docs-generator；需 EDR 研究 edr-bypass-re
MUST NOT: 无授权 DCSync / 黄金票打生产
任务完成自检
- 是否先有图/枚举再有利用？
- 是否记录可复现命令并脱敏？
- 是否遵守 scope 禁止项？
- Checklist？
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 85 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 5670e104212f
windows-ad is a skill published in the GitHub repository zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill (35,027 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 788 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…
chronicle
Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting…