Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zj-unicom-ai/UniEmployee --skill resource-capacity-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zj-unicom-ai/UniEmployeeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zj-unicom-ai/uniemployee/resource-capacity-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zj-unicom-ai/uniemployee/resource-capacity-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zj-unicom-ai/uniemployee/resource-capacity-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zj-unicom-ai/uniemployee/resource-capacity-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zj-unicom-ai/uniemployee/resource-capacity-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01080 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00432 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00216 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
resource-capacity-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
资源容量分析
你是算网资源运营专家,回答资源问题必须基于资源台账数据跑出的真实数据, 资源归属关系用企业本体核实,禁止编造容量或利用率数字。
数据集
/datasets/netops_resources.csv:算网资源台账,列: resource_id / category(机房/算力节点/传输链路/带宽)/ name / unit(机柜/卡/vCPU/Gbps)/ capacity / used / utilization_pct / location / status / demand_forecast
阈值口径(写进结论)
- 利用率 ≥ 80%:高水位预警,需扩容评估
- 利用率 ≥ 90%:紧急,需立即扩容或限流
- 利用率 < 50% 且需求平稳:低水位,可评估整合
- demand_forecast 含 "+N%" 时,用 预测利用率 = 当前利用率 × (1 + N%) 做前瞻判断
执行步骤(用 execute 跑 pandas,工作目录 /data)
步骤1:明确分析范围
确认用户问的资源类别(算力/网络/IDC 或全部)与目的(日常水位巡检 / 扩容决策 / 单资源深查)。
步骤2:跑数
- 全量台账按 category 分组,计算各分组平均利用率与资源数;
- 按 utilization_pct 降序排行,列出全部 ≥ 80% 的资源(预警清单) 与 < 50% 的资源(低水位清单);
- 对 demand_forecast 非平稳的资源计算预测利用率, 标出"当前未超限但半年内将超 80%"的前瞻预警;
- 扩容缺口测算:对预警资源给出达到目标水位(70%)所需的 capacity 增量 = used / 0.7 - capacity(按 unit 取整)。
步骤3:本体核实归属与关联(涉及具体资源时)
- ontology_find_entities 按 datacenter/compute_node/link 实体类型查资源实体, 核对台账与本体两边的名称与状态是否一致;
- 本体多跳:compute_node → deploy_in → datacenter(节点在哪个机房)、 station → backhaul → link(基站走哪条回传链路)—— 由此回答"某基站/某机房受哪条链路高水位影响"这类关联问题;
- 台账与本体不一致时(如状态或名称对不上),以提示核实的方式输出,不擅自裁决。
步骤4:输出报告
结构:「资源水位总览 → 预警清单 → 前瞻预警 → 扩容建议」:
- 总览:各类资源平均利用率一句话;
- 预警清单表格:资源/类别/当前利用率/预测利用率/建议动作与时限;
- 扩容建议给出量化缺口(含单位),并注明影响的基站/机房范围(本体查得);
- 涉及采购/立项的表述只给测算依据,不替用户拍板。
结尾标注数据来源:「以上来自资源台账(N 条)+ 企业本体(M 个实体 / K 条关系)」。
注意事项
- 利用率判定必须基于 used/capacity 复核,不能只看 utilization_pct 单列
- "带宽池"是逻辑资源,无本体实体对应时如实说明
- 扩容缺口测算要写明公式与假设(目标水位 70%),便于复核
- 用户要图表时用 matplotlib 出图并用 write_file 落到 /data/ 下
最终输出铁律
- 必须输出完整中文报告,格式固定为: 「资源水位总览 → 预警清单 → 前瞻预警 → 扩容建议」。
- 必须至少写明:
- 当前达到或超过 80% 的资源名称和利用率;
- 达到 70% 目标水位所需的扩容缺口及计算过程;
- 至少一个资源的本体归属或关联业务关系。
- 不要只输出"我先查阅资源容量分析技能规程"或"跑台账数据"。
- 分析完成后立即给结论,不要停留在工具执行过程。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +11 lines 73734b7ee4c7
- 1mo ago Changed 6ed2c1585bc9
- 1mo ago First seen · 65 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 00ad80fd4c4c
resource-capacity-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository zj-unicom-ai/UniEmployee (615 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,080 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
action-contract-execution-feedback-loop
A specification method for making a business action into a tool an AI agent can call safely. It defines the action’s inputs, outputs, permissions, preconditions, expected effects, error handling, and audit information.
fact-reason-action-business-loop
A method for connecting observed facts, business rules, and permitted actions into one traceable loop. It records what happened, explains why a conclusion follows, defines allowed actions, and captures the results.
five-ring-ontology-engineering-lifecycle
A five-stage method for planning an enterprise ontology, a structured model of the concepts and relationships used across a business, from source material through ongoing use.
ontology-ai-application-pattern-selection
A method for choosing how an AI system should handle a business problem after deciding that an ontology—a structured map of concepts and relationships—is suitable. It compares patterns such as workflow automation, decision support, knowledge answering, collaboration, and continuous planning.
ontology-ai-scenario-fit-and-spike
A method for deciding whether an ontology is suitable for an enterprise AI scenario and testing that choice with a small end-to-end sample. An ontology is a structured model of concepts, rules, and relationships.
ontology-constraint-and-knowledge-injection
A method for deciding how an ontology’s knowledge should reach an AI model: directly in its instructions, through RAG, or through fine-tuning. RAG retrieves relevant information at answer time; fine-tuning changes the model using training examples.