Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zxkane/autonomous-dev-team --skill autonomous-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zxkane/autonomous-dev-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zxkane/autonomous-dev-team/autonomous-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zxkane/autonomous-dev-team/autonomous-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zxkane/autonomous-dev-team/autonomous-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zxkane/autonomous-dev-team/autonomous-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zxkane/autonomous-dev-team/autonomous-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00127 | $0.04965 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00051 | $0.01986 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00993 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00496 |
Grade A, and why
autonomous-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 20d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 20d ago Changed · +12 lines 7710673618f4
- 1mo ago Changed · +13 lines 139c3e9d09cc
- 2mo ago First seen · 311 lines · 127 tokens per session scan A 533228be3e0d
autonomous-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository zxkane/autonomous-dev-team (40 stars, last pushed 20d ago), with no licence file. It adds 127 tokens to every session and 4,965 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ast-pe
An engineering delivery role for turning an approved design into working, tested, reviewable, and reversible software across modules. It covers implementation, integration, debugging, and delivery checks.
testing-strategy
Design test strategies and test plans with coverage targets. Complements /draft:coverage which measures what this skill plans. Auto-loaded by /draft:implement before TDD.
Impact Evidence Coverage 影響・失敗系・外部依存の証拠充足
A review check for evidence that a code change’s affected areas, failure paths, and external dependencies were investigated.
Eval-Driven Skill Design
A review guide for new coding-agent skills that checks whether each skill has both examples it should catch and examples it should ignore, plus evaluation setup.
Component Test Scaffold (Next.js)
Generate React/Next.js component test skeletons (RTL) from specifications.
Component Test Scaffold (Vue.js)
Generate Vue.js component test skeletons (Vue Test Utils) from specifications.