19,479 mods in this category, of every kind an
agent can take. Each one carries what it costs per session, what the
scan found, and whether it is the original.
Use for coding, debugging, refactoring, design, test strategy, code review, documentation alignment, and development research. A language-agnostic direct, bounded, or full workflow with persistent decisions and independent review.
★not rated 12
changed 6d agoA
tokens not measured
originalMIT
README-ROAST — Your README is lying. 8 savage personas roast your project's README with a Honesty Score, 3-5 punchy observations, a tweet-ready one-liner, and a shareable badge. Short. Funny. Accurate. Invoke with /readme-roast on any repo. Screenshot the output. Share it. Let the badge spread.
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.
Use before opening a PR to do a maintainer-perspective review of a branch. Walks through "why does this exist", "is the design right", "is the implementation correct", and "are tests / docs / changelog complete". Invoked when the user says "review my branch", "do a full review", "is this PR ready", or…
Reviews and grades an agent skill directory (SKILL.md plus supporting resources) for specification compliance, clarity, token efficiency, safety, robustness, and portability. Produces an evidence-cited weighted score and grade, P1/P2/P3 findings with minimal patch text, and a machine-readable verdict with structured…
Design and review Rails applications using layered architecture principles from "Layered Design for Ruby on Rails Applications". Use when analyzing Rails codebases, reviewing PRs for architecture violations, planning feature implementations, or implementing patterns like authorization, view components, or AI…
Cross-host adversarial review with material-only findings and mandatory over-engineering counterfactuals. Author-aware routing: Claude-authored work goes to Codex GPT-6 Astra high, then Grok 4.7 xhigh; Codex-authored work goes to Grok 4.7 xhigh, never back to Codex; then the Pi chain (DeepSeek V4 Flash, Kimi K3) and…
★not rated 12
changed 1mo agoA
tokens not measured
originalMIT
Orchestrate plan reviews, task generation, implementation, and code reviews in parallel across 19 coding harnesses (Codex, Cursor, opencode, pi, omp, fx, aider, Antigravity…) — or ask every model a free-text question about a plan.
Use when reviewing code for Clean Code, DDD, Harness Engineering, or Agentic Engineering issues. Covers readability, maintainability, testability, observability, and AI-agent guardrails.
Strip the sycophancy. Makes Claude honestly audit its own claimed-complete work against 17 named under-delivery patterns instead of polishing a summary over half-finished tasks.
★not rated 11 2mo agoA
tokens not measured
originalMIT
Comprehensive feature development workflow with specialized agents for codebase exploration, architecture design, and quality review.
★not rated 11 6mo agoA
tokens not measured
originalApache-2.0
At most 3 mods per repository are shown here, and a mod shipped inside a plugin is left to that plugin's page — the rest are on their repository pages: