19,479 mods in this category, of every kind an
agent can take. Each one carries what it costs per session, what the
scan found, and whether it is the original.
Use this agent when you want an adversarial review of a deliverable that the main agent has produced — typically a TG draft, technical document, business analysis, OSS PR description, or strategic recommendation. The critic is adversarial by design: its job is to find what the main agent missed, got wrong, or…
Use Gemini CLI from Claude Code to review code, analyze codebases, or delegate tasks. Leverages Gemini's 1M token context window for whole-codebase analysis.
★not rated 6 7mo agoA
tokens not measured
originalApache-2.0
Reconnaissance sweep of any codebase, feature by feature: what works, what's broken, what's missing, what's untested. Emits one evidence-cited JSON state file per feature plus a rollup, renders a self-contained HTML dashboard, and turns the findings into ordered task files that update the report as fixes land.…
★not rated 6 3mo agoA
tokens not measured
originalMIT
Review test code for resource cleanup, mock hygiene, and best practices in Bun/Node.js projects. Use after writing tests or when debugging flaky tests.
Strict issue-ledger and exit-gate system that prevents false completion claims. Uses your signed-in Codex as an independent reviewer - Claude cannot claim 'all fixed' until every finding is actually closed.
★not rated 6 7mo agoA
tokens not measured
originalMIT
Complete feature development workflow with code mapping, TDD, task-based implementation, multi-agent review, UI verification, PR management, and state persistence.
★not rated 6 9mo agoA
tokens not measured
originalMIT
Field-level semantic impact analysis for Claude Code — see the ripple effect of any code change. Runs locally from the ripple-impact-mcp Python package.
Splits a large change into small, single-purpose units of review — PRs, diffs, or CLs — each making one argument (one diff, one thesis) and each buildable and testable on its own. Use when a change is too big to review, when a feature builds on existing code, when working in a large monorepo with stacked diffs, or…
Run multi-model code review with the MMR CLI (mmr review) before merging or finishing a change, or a multi-model design critique (mmr critique) of a design doc, plan, or proposed approach before building it. Use when the user asks to review code, a PR, a diff, or staged changes, or to critique/second-opinion a design…
Audits a code change against a 54-phase failure taxonomy and reports what it did not check, not just what it found. Domain overlays run first and force critical-path treatment.
★not rated 6
changed 27d agoA
tokens not measured
originalMIT
Principal-level software architect for architecture reviews, pre-implementation specification reviews, and spec-conformance verification. Use when the user asks to review architecture, evaluate design decisions, audit system boundaries, check for anti-patterns, evaluate whether a specification is ready to be…
Generate a human-readable explanation of implemented changes after coding. Use after implementing a specification to document what changed, why, which trade-offs were accepted, and which vulnerabilities were found and fixed. The audience includes developers, reviewers, managers, and stakeholders.
🛡️ AI Code Quality Control System for Cursor IDE - Prevents low-quality code by enforcing mandatory research protocols before modifications. Optimized for Rust/Bevy stack with universal support via Context7 & web search.
Pre-push gate for the current branch's diff. Runs review-plan-v2's deterministic analyzers (gitleaks, markdownlint, actionlint, shellcheck, ruff, structural) with --static-only, then the CodeRabbit CLI for the actual review. No API keys, nothing billed to you, and no diff leaves the machine on the first leg. The…
★not rated 6
changed 2mo agoA105 tokens
At most 3 mods per repository are shown here, and a mod shipped inside a plugin is left to that plugin's page — the rest are on their repository pages: