Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RahSwe/claude-code-full-dev-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/rahswe/claude-code-full-dev-workflow/full-dev-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/rahswe/claude-code-full-dev-workflow/full-dev-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/rahswe/claude-code-full-dev-workflow/full-dev-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/rahswe/claude-code-full-dev-workflow/full-dev-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/rahswe/claude-code-full-dev-workflow/full-dev-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
full-dev-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "full-dev-workflow",
"description": "Complete feature development workflow with code mapping, TDD, task-based implementation, multi-agent review, UI verification, PR management, and state persistence",
"version": "1.1.2",
"author": {
"name": "RahSwe",
"url": "https://github.com/RahSwe"
},
"repository": "https://github.com/RahSwe/claude-code-full-dev-workflow",
"homepage": "https://github.com/RahSwe/claude-code-full-dev-workflow#readme",
"license": "MIT",
"keywords": [
"workflow",
"tdd",
"code-review",
"automation",
"testing",
"pull-request",
"development"
]
}
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 3 commands, 8 agents, 3 hooks travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 234 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
- Command full-dev A 25 tokens
- Command resume A 9 tokens
- Command help A 8 tokens
- Agent reviewer-performance A 19 tokens
- Agent reviewer-security A 21 tokens
- Agent code-explorer A 21 tokens
- Agent reviewer-bugs A 25 tokens
- Agent reviewer-quality A 25 tokens
- Agent test-architect A 24 tokens
- Agent reviewer-conventions A 23 tokens
- Agent code-simplifier A 34 tokens
- Hook PostToolUse A not measured
- Hook UserPromptSubmit A not measured
- Hook Stop A not measured
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 22 lines scan A b6094cfe6efc
full-dev-workflow is a plugin published in the GitHub repository RahSwe/claude-code-full-dev-workflow (6 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other plugins, from other repositories
mattpocock-skills
Matt Pocock's agent skills for real engineering: grilling, spec/ticket flows, TDD, code review, domain modelling and more. Plug-and-play, not vibe coding.
openmetadata-skills
Complete AI development workflow for OpenMetadata — structured planning, TDD, code review, test enforcement (90% coverage), systematic debugging, and connector development. Includes language-specific review agents for Java, Python, and TypeScript.
superjawn
Research-augmented fork of obra/superpowers. Ships 13 workflow skills (brainstorming, planning, code review, debugging, verification, worktrees, parallel agents) standalone, with no dependency on the upstream superpowers plugin.
ring marketplace
Lerian Studio plugin marketplace: Core software engineering skills (TDD, debugging, code review), specialized developer agents (Backend, DevOps, Frontend, QA, SRE) plus 12 code-review reviewers (9 default hard-gate reviewers and 3 conditional stack specialists), product planning workflows (8-gate pre-dev system), and…
ring-default
Core skills library from the Lerian Team: TDD, code review, collaboration patterns, and proven techniques. 23 essential skills for software engineering excellence, including plan authoring and execution.
mattpocock-skills
Skills adapted from Matt Pocock's public collection.