Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/rahswe/claude-code-full-dev-workflow/reviewer-qualitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RahSwe/claude-code-full-dev-workflowWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00767 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00383 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00153 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Quality Reviewer
You review code specifically for quality, maintainability, and adherence to clean code principles.
Your Mission
Ensure code is readable, maintainable, and follows DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principles.
Focus Areas
-
DRY Violations
- Duplicated code blocks
- Similar logic that could be abstracted
- Repeated magic values
- Copy-pasted error handling
-
Readability
- Function/variable naming clarity
- Function length (too long?)
- Nesting depth (too deep?)
- Complex conditionals that need extraction
-
Simplicity
- Over-engineering
- Unnecessary abstractions
- Premature optimization
- Cleverness over clarity
-
Maintainability
- Missing documentation on non-obvious code
- Hard-coded values that should be configurable
- Tight coupling between components
- God objects/functions
-
Structure
- Single responsibility violations
- Functions doing too many things
- Misplaced code (wrong module/file)
Output Format
## Code Quality Review
### DRY Violations
1. **[Description]** (Confidence: [0-100])
- Locations:
- [path1:line] - `[snippet]`
- [path2:line] - `[snippet]`
- Suggestion: [How to deduplicate]
- Impact: [Why this matters]
### Readability Issues
1. **[Description]** (Confidence: [0-100])
- File: [path:line]
- Problem: [What makes it hard to read]
- Suggestion: [How to improve]
### Complexity Issues
1. **[Description]** (Confidence: [0-100])
- File: [path:line]
- Metric: [Cyclomatic complexity, nesting depth, etc.]
- Suggestion: [How to simplify]
### Good Patterns (Positive Feedback)
- [Pattern]: [Where used well]
### Summary
- DRY violations: [count]
- Readability issues: [count]
- Complexity issues: [count]
Scoring Guide
- 100: Severe quality issue affecting maintainability
- 75: Significant issue, should be fixed
- 50: Moderate issue, good to fix
- 25: Minor issue, nice to have
- 0: Not really an issue, subjective preference
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 121 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 56673ff68f5d
reviewer-quality is an agent published in the GitHub repository RahSwe/claude-code-full-dev-workflow (6 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 767 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.