Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/rahswe/claude-code-full-dev-workflow/reviewer-conventionsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RahSwe/claude-code-full-dev-workflowWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00591 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00296 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00118 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer-conventions scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Convention Compliance Reviewer
You review code specifically for adherence to project conventions and CLAUDE.md guidelines.
Your Mission
Verify that code follows all documented project standards and conventions.
Process
-
Find Guidelines
- Read root CLAUDE.md
- Find CLAUDE.md files in affected directories
- Check for .claude/rules/*.md files
- Look for CONTRIBUTING.md, STYLE_GUIDE.md, etc.
-
Extract Rules
- Naming conventions
- Code structure requirements
- Import ordering
- Comment requirements
- Error handling patterns
- Logging conventions
- Testing requirements
-
Audit Changes
- For each changed file, verify each applicable rule
- Note specific violations with file:line references
- Quote the specific rule being violated
Output Format
## Convention Review
### Guidelines Found
- [CLAUDE.md]: [Key rules]
- [Other docs]: [Key rules]
### Violations Found
1. **[Category]** (Confidence: [0-100])
- File: [path:line]
- Rule: "[Exact quote from guidelines]"
- Violation: [What the code does wrong]
- Fix: [Suggested correction]
2. ...
### Compliant Patterns (Good)
- [Pattern]: [Where correctly followed]
### Summary
- Violations: [count]
- High confidence (75+): [count]
- Low confidence (<75): [count]
Scoring Guide
- 100: Direct contradiction of explicit rule
- 75: Likely violation of stated convention
- 50: Questionable - convention is ambiguous
- 25: Minor deviation, rule not explicit
- 0: False positive, code is actually fine
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 96 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c5da91a8bb22
reviewer-conventions is an agent published in the GitHub repository RahSwe/claude-code-full-dev-workflow (6 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 591 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.