17,650 mods in this category, of every kind an
agent can take. Each one carries what it costs per session, what the
scan found, and whether it is the original.
Removes AI-generated code slop (redundant comments, over-engineering, verbose names, boilerplate, dead defensive code) and normalizes style. Use when the user asks to clean up code, remove AI slop, de-slop, fix code style, refactor for readability, or make code more idiomatic.
Check your work with a verification subagent that reviews diffs, runs builds and tests, and evaluates correctness. Read this file for instructions. Use when asked to "check work", "verify changes", "self-verify", "/check-work", "/check", "/verify", or "/self-verify".
Reviews TypeScript system architecture to determine whether Effect (effect-ts) should be used, where it applies, and to what extent. Use when reviewing implementation plans, evaluating proposed architectures, or providing guidance to downstream implementation agents.
Use this agent for comprehensive code reviews of NestJS backend implementations following DDD + CQRS patterns. It validates architectural compliance, separation of concerns (Controllers, Handlers, Repositories), test coverage, and code quality. Ideal for reviewing feature branches that implement business logic with…
Use when completing or claiming readiness for local-only changes, a branch, pull request, merge request, or merge-to-main; final review applies even when repository policy forbids publishing, including scope growth, proposed work splits, and medium-risk review-budget checkpoints.
Use when the user asks for an extensive, maximum-quality, whole-codebase review or audit and wants a consolidated findings report (read-only, default). Add --autopilot to run a fully autonomous performance pipeline: read Supabase signals, deep-dive via dynamic workflows, refine fixes with a headless Codex pass, apply…
Tactical orchestrator during implementation and cross-domain convention registrar. Authors conventions in the tactical-implementation domain; routes convention authorship in other domains to the declared owner agent. Deconstructs stories into plans, routes to domain specialist agents, and reviews code for convention…
Proactive codebase analysis agent that scans for the highest-impact improvement opportunities across architecture, security, performance, testing, code quality, and more.
★not rated 4 5mo agoA
tokens not measured
originalMIT
She hates your PR. Cross-model code review that uses Codex CLI to find every bug you and Claude Code messed up. Evaluates findings, filters false positives, auto-fixes confirmed bugs. She will talk to a manager if needed.
★not rated 4 5mo agoA
tokens not measured
originalMIT
Use PROACTIVELY when user mentions: review, code review, audit, quality, assess, evaluate, critique, feedback, score, rate, check my code, how does this look, is this good, technical debt, code smell, best practices, clean code, code quality, maintainability, refactor review, PR review, pull request, merge request…
Multi-model planning & review councils for Claude Code: fusion-plan runs a Claude role panel (architect/skeptic/test/maintainer) plus GPT-5.6 Sol via the local Codex CLI; fusion-review runs a bench-validated duo (one generalist Claude seat + GPT-5.6 Sol; role panel via args.roles) — each adjudicated and written up by…
★not rated 4 1mo agoA
tokens not measured
At most 3 mods per repository are shown here, and a mod shipped inside a plugin is left to that plugin's page — the rest are on their repository pages: