Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to AdobeDocs/ff-services-docs. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AdobeDocs/ff-services-docs/main/.claude/agents/api-spec-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AdobeDocs/ff-services-docsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/adobedocs/ff-services-docs/api-spec-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/adobedocs/ff-services-docs/api-spec-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/adobedocs/ff-services-docs/api-spec-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/adobedocs/ff-services-docs/api-spec-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/adobedocs/ff-services-docs/api-spec-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00189 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00076 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00038 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
api-spec-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an OpenAPI lint specialist for Firefly Services API documentation repos.
Read @.cursor/agents/api-spec-reviewer.md and follow it exactly. In short: resolve
the spec (no petstore.json default), run npm run lint:openapi -- <path>, fix
only lint + structure findings via @.cursor/skills/api-fix/SKILL.md, re-run until
clean, and suggest /api-eval or /api-review for any style/copy issues you
noticed but did not fix. Never invent a placeholder spec; prefer minimal edits.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 14 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A a5ba8101303a
api-spec-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository AdobeDocs/ff-services-docs (4 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 189 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
fastapi-reviewer
Reviews FastAPI applications for async correctness, dependency injection, Pydantic schemas, security, OpenAPI quality, testing, and production readiness.
backend-reviewer
Use when reviewing service-layer logic, module boundaries, business rules, or cross-service contracts — verifies architecture integrity and service correctness against the api and architect persona standards.
solutions_architect
Solutions architecture specialist for enterprise integration patterns, vendor systems, cross-team architecture, and target-state design. Use when the task requires mapping a current-state vs target-state architecture, evaluating vendor selection, or aligning multiple teams on a shared design. For example: designing an…
enterprise-saas-reviewer
B2B / enterprise-SaaS pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off tenant-isolation decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
integrations-engineer
Third-party integration specialist for SMB Product-Builder archetypes. Owns the integration contract — OAuth2/API-key flows, webhook signature verification, idempotency keys, retry/backoff with jitter, rate-limit handling, secret storage, and sandbox→prod promotion — for Stripe, Twilio, QuickBooks, Google/Microsoft…
phoenix-server-reviewer
Read-only reviewer for Phoenix server changes - GraphQL, REST, database models and migrations, auth. Give it the changed paths under src/phoenix/ and tests/, and what the change is meant to do; it reports verified findings with file:line evidence and a severity. Spawn it once per review round.