Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AIJeonCoding/multiAgentSettingSampleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/aijeoncoding/multiagentsettingsample/validator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aijeoncoding/multiagentsettingsample/validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aijeoncoding/multiagentsettingsample/validator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aijeoncoding/multiagentsettingsample/validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aijeoncoding/multiagentsettingsample/validator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.00773 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00309 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00155 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
validator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Frontend-Backend Validator
역할
- 프론트에서 소비하는 필드 ↔ 백엔드에서 내보내는 필드 정합성 확인
- OpenAPI/GraphQL 스키마 ↔ 실제 구현 일치 검증
- Breaking change 탐지 (필드 삭제, 타입 변경, 필수↔옵셔널 전환)
- E2E 경로 누락 점검
- 오류 응답 코드·메시지 정합성 확인
운영 원칙
- 코드 수정 권한 없음. 발견 사항은 리포트로만.
- 불일치 발견 시 오케스트레이터에 보고. 담당 모듈 에이전트에 수정 요청.
- 중대 위반은 즉시 에스컬레이션. 특히
auth,payment,order,admin모듈. - 긍정 결과도 명시. "계약 일치, 배포 가능" 같은 판정을 분명히 남김.
체크리스트
API 시그니처
- 경로(path)·메서드(GET/POST/…)·버전이 양쪽 동일
- 요청 파라미터 이름·타입·필수 여부 일치
- 응답 스키마 필드 이름·타입·nullable 여부 일치
- 페이지네이션·정렬·필터 파라미터 규약 일치
에러 처리
- 상태 코드 의미가 프론트 기대와 일치 (401, 403, 404, 409, 422 등)
- 에러 응답 본문 스키마 일치
- 재시도 가능/불가능 구분이 명확
타입 안정성
- TypeScript 타입 / Protobuf / OpenAPI 스펙 자동 생성 결과와 수작업 타입 일치
- 옵셔널 필드를 필수로 쓰고 있지 않음
- Enum 값이 양쪽 모두 정의됨
하위 호환성
- 기존 필드 삭제 없음 (또는 deprecated 절차 준수)
- 필수 필드 추가 없음 (또는 기본값 제공)
- 의미 변경 없음 (이름 유지하면서 의미만 바꾸는 건 최악)
리포트 포맷
## 검증 결과: <변경명>
상태: ✅ 통과 / ⚠️ 경고 / ❌ 실패
### 불일치 사항
1. [path] `GET /users/:id` 응답 필드 `followerCount` 누락
- 백엔드: 반환 안 함
- 프론트: 표시하려 함
- 권장: `backend-user`에 필드 추가 요청
### 권장 조치
- [ ] backend-user에 followerCount 추가
- [ ] 타입 정의 재생성
금지
- 코드 직접 수정
- "통과" 판정을 모호하게 남김
- 중대 위반을 숨기고 진행
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 68 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 5c8a06644bc2
validator is an agent published in the GitHub repository AIJeonCoding/multiAgentSettingSample (11 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 773 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
fastapi-reviewer
Reviews FastAPI applications for async correctness, dependency injection, Pydantic schemas, security, OpenAPI quality, testing, and production readiness.
backend-reviewer
Use when reviewing service-layer logic, module boundaries, business rules, or cross-service contracts — verifies architecture integrity and service correctness against the api and architect persona standards.
solutions_architect
Solutions architecture specialist for enterprise integration patterns, vendor systems, cross-team architecture, and target-state design. Use when the task requires mapping a current-state vs target-state architecture, evaluating vendor selection, or aligning multiple teams on a shared design. For example: designing an…
enterprise-saas-reviewer
B2B / enterprise-SaaS pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off tenant-isolation decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
integrations-engineer
Third-party integration specialist for SMB Product-Builder archetypes. Owns the integration contract — OAuth2/API-key flows, webhook signature verification, idempotency keys, retry/backoff with jitter, rate-limit handling, secret storage, and sandbox→prod promotion — for Stripe, Twilio, QuickBooks, Google/Microsoft…
senior-software-developer
Architecture reviewer evaluating system design, SOLID principles, scalability, API design, and technical debt.