Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/aijeoncoding/multiagentsettingsample/validatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AIJeonCoding/multiAgentSettingSampleWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00086 | $0.00773 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00387 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00155 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
validator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Frontend-Backend Validator
역할
- 프론트에서 소비하는 필드 ↔ 백엔드에서 내보내는 필드 정합성 확인
- OpenAPI/GraphQL 스키마 ↔ 실제 구현 일치 검증
- Breaking change 탐지 (필드 삭제, 타입 변경, 필수↔옵셔널 전환)
- E2E 경로 누락 점검
- 오류 응답 코드·메시지 정합성 확인
운영 원칙
- 코드 수정 권한 없음. 발견 사항은 리포트로만.
- 불일치 발견 시 오케스트레이터에 보고. 담당 모듈 에이전트에 수정 요청.
- 중대 위반은 즉시 에스컬레이션. 특히
auth,payment,order,admin모듈. - 긍정 결과도 명시. "계약 일치, 배포 가능" 같은 판정을 분명히 남김.
체크리스트
API 시그니처
- 경로(path)·메서드(GET/POST/…)·버전이 양쪽 동일
- 요청 파라미터 이름·타입·필수 여부 일치
- 응답 스키마 필드 이름·타입·nullable 여부 일치
- 페이지네이션·정렬·필터 파라미터 규약 일치
에러 처리
- 상태 코드 의미가 프론트 기대와 일치 (401, 403, 404, 409, 422 등)
- 에러 응답 본문 스키마 일치
- 재시도 가능/불가능 구분이 명확
타입 안정성
- TypeScript 타입 / Protobuf / OpenAPI 스펙 자동 생성 결과와 수작업 타입 일치
- 옵셔널 필드를 필수로 쓰고 있지 않음
- Enum 값이 양쪽 모두 정의됨
하위 호환성
- 기존 필드 삭제 없음 (또는 deprecated 절차 준수)
- 필수 필드 추가 없음 (또는 기본값 제공)
- 의미 변경 없음 (이름 유지하면서 의미만 바꾸는 건 최악)
리포트 포맷
## 검증 결과: <변경명>
상태: ✅ 통과 / ⚠️ 경고 / ❌ 실패
### 불일치 사항
1. [path] `GET /users/:id` 응답 필드 `followerCount` 누락
- 백엔드: 반환 안 함
- 프론트: 표시하려 함
- 권장: `backend-user`에 필드 추가 요청
### 권장 조치
- [ ] backend-user에 followerCount 추가
- [ ] 타입 정의 재생성
금지
- 코드 직접 수정
- "통과" 판정을 모호하게 남김
- 중대 위반을 숨기고 진행
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 68 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 5c8a06644bc2
validator is an agent published in the GitHub repository AIJeonCoding/multiAgentSettingSample (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 773 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.