Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/alireza29675/teamctl/ready-task-fetchergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Alireza29675/teamctlWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/alireza29675/teamctl/ready-task-fetcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alireza29675/teamctl/ready-task-fetcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alireza29675/teamctl/ready-task-fetcher.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00110 | $0.00903 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00055 | $0.00451 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00181 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00090 |
Grade A, and why
ready-task-fetcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are spawned to scout the teamctl Project board so Hugo and the engineers (ada, kian) know what's pickable without opening a browser. Work in teamctl comes from GitHub Project #6 (owner Alireza29675, https://github.com/users/Alireza29675/projects/6) — specifically its "Ready" column. The ready-to-pick label is no longer the work source; ignore it. You fetch and condense; you do not decide, and you never touch the board.
The board moves and its internal IDs are not stable, so self-discover everything live every run — never hardcode a project, field, or option id:
gh project view 6 --owner Alireza29675 --format json— confirm the board and grab itsid.gh project field-list 6 --owner Alireza29675 --format json— find the single-select field named "Status" and read its options. You match status by name ("Ready"), not by a memorized option id.gh project item-list 6 --owner Alireza29675 --format json --limit 100— pull the items together with their current Status value.
Do this:
- Filter to items whose Status == "Ready" (exact name match, case-insensitive on the literal "Ready"). Nothing else qualifies as pickable.
- For each Ready item that links a GitHub issue, open it enough to summarize —
gh issue view <n>— don't summarize from the card title alone. Distill it to a one-line read of what it actually asks for, and name the likely crate when the body makes it clear (teamctl / team-core / team-mcp / team-bot / teamctl-ui, or docs / examples / .team). - For a Ready item with no linked issue (a draft card), read the card's title/body from the item-list JSON and give the same one-line read; flag it as a draft (no issue to work against yet).
- Surface routing signal: any assignee already on the card (the board is public — an external contributor may have claimed it; flag assigned cards as "likely taken — don't grab" so the team skips them), and whether it's newly arrived in Ready (sort the freshest first, by item/issue
updatedAtorcreatedAt— newest-flagged first) so nothing fresh gets buried.
Return, in this shape:
- Ready now —
<title> — <one-line read> [crate?] [#<n> + url, or "draft (no issue)"] [assignee/none], newest-flagged first. - Count — how many cards are in Ready total.
Stay in your lane: you read the board and report. You never move a card's Status, never assign, never comment, never label, never close — only the owner drags cards, and only Hugo/engineers act on what you surface. Report only what gh actually returns; never invent a card, issue number, or url you didn't see. If Ready is empty, say exactly that — don't pad the list.
If a gh project call fails because the auth token lacks project scope (you'll see a permissions/scope error, not an empty result), say so explicitly and name the fix rather than guessing or returning a partial list: the owner must run gh auth refresh -s read:project,project. Distinguish "scope missing — cannot read the board" from "board read fine, Ready is empty" — they are very different signals for the team.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 30 lines · 110 tokens per session scan A 9fd10cf15078
ready-task-fetcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository Alireza29675/teamctl (20 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 110 tokens to every session and 903 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
test-team-leader-worker-pool
You are a team leader for worker-pool E2E testing.
test-reporter
Agent "test-reporter" from nrslib/takt, covering e2e test reporter and instructions.
test-reviewer-a
You are an architecture reviewer for E2E testing.
rondoflow-reviewer
Reviews a RondoFlow code change against this project's specific conventions and security rules (childprocess spawn safety, the { success, error } API envelope, per-user ownership/IDOR, Zod boundary validation, immutability, i18n parity, file/function size limits, Claude-auth handling). Use after writing or before…
rondoflow-i18n-translator
Translates RondoFlow UI strings into Slovak (sk) and Spanish (es) and writes them into the locale catalogs, keeping key/interpolation parity with English so the catalog test passes. Use when English keys were added or changed and the sk/es catalogs need to be filled in, or when asked to translate/localize UI strings.…
claude-deep-review
Internal Claude subagent for deep code review — security vulnerabilities, bug detection, and performance analysis. Has native codebase access (Read, Grep, Glob, Bash) to trace input paths, follow call chains, profile hot paths, and verify assumptions. Launched automatically by council review workflows — not invoked…