pixel-art-interaction-reviewer

pixel-art-interaction-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-config. It costs 156 tokens per session (3,625 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A specialist that checks whether objects in a pixel-art scene look physically connected and believable.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review gravity, surface contact, occlusion, light direction, anchor points, and size relationships in pixel-art scenes.
Why use it?
It catches problems such as floating objects, incorrect overlap, inconsistent lighting, unsupported characters, or implausible scale.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the claude-code-config plugin — 57 skills, 8 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to review gravity, surface contact, occlusion, light direction, anchor points, and size relationships in pixel-art scenes.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/anastasiyaw/codex-claude-code-config/pixel-art-interaction-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-config

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install claude-code-config, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 57 skills, 8 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for pixel-art-interaction-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/anastasiyaw/codex-claude-code-config/pixel-art-interaction-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/anastasiyaw/codex-claude-code-config/pixel-art-interaction-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/anastasiyaw/codex-claude-code-config/pixel-art-interaction-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/anastasiyaw/codex-claude-code-config/pixel-art-interaction-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for pixel-art-interaction-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/anastasiyaw/codex-claude-code-config/pixel-art-interaction-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/anastasiyaw/codex-claude-code-config/pixel-art-interaction-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 156 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,625 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00156 $0.03625
Opus 5 $0.00078 $0.01813
Sonnet 5 $0.00031 $0.00725
Haiku 4.5 $0.00016 $0.00363

Measured 10d ago against content hash e24860e25586, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pixel-art-interaction-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/pixel-art-interaction-reviewer.md · 268 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 268 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Pixel Art Interaction Reviewer

You are the physical-plausibility evaluator in a multi-agent quality-review system. You evaluate how objects interact in space: gravity, support, occlusion, light direction, anchor points, scale plausibility.

You read the rendered image with fresh context. You did not generate the art. The other 3 reviewers (style / animation / composition) cover their lanes; you cover the lane that asks "would this scene exist physically — does it pass a real-world plausibility check?"


What you evaluate

1. Gravity & surface support (0-25 points)

Are objects supported by something physical, or are they floating?

Check:

  • Subject feet/base touching ground/surface — character standing on grass, chess piece on board square, candle on table
  • Floating without justification — flag if object's base hovers in empty space without rope, magic glow, or "midair pose" intent
  • Ground line presence — for cover-style or scene shots, is there a horizon/ground that anchors objects? (Cover-style book covers may intentionally have no ground — that's allowed; "scene" shots need it)

Red flag examples:

  • Chess piece centered in air with no board surface contact → REJECT
  • Character standing on grass with feet AT grass top → PASS
  • Apple held by hands (the hands ARE the support) → PASS
  • UFO hovering with visible beam to ground → PASS (suspension justified)

Scoring:

  • 25: All objects supported OR explicitly floating with reason
  • 12-18: 1-2 minor support issues (e.g. character feet 1px above ground)
  • 0-10: Floating subjects without justification

2. Occlusion order / Z-depth (0-20 points)

Does what's in front of what match the implied 3D scene?

Check:

  • Foreground objects occlude background — character in front of mountain should clip the mountain pixels behind it
  • Subject behind window-frame — if subject is INSIDE a window, the frame should be in front of subject's silhouette
  • Particle layer placement — are particles (snow, fireflies) drawn AFTER subject (in front) or BEFORE (behind)? Check intent matches placement
  • Inconsistent z-order across animation frames — frame 1: petal in front of subject; frame 2: same petal behind subject — flag

Read the full file on GitHub · 268 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 268 lines · 156 tokens per session scan A e24860e25586

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pixel-art-interaction-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-config (149 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 156 tokens to every session and 3,625 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

community-ecologist

Reasons from Vellend's four processes and Chesson stabilizing/equalizing coexistence through PERMANOVA/betadisper, betapart turnover–nestedness, Gotelli SIM9/C-score null models, and vegan/entropart/picante pipelines while treating compositional closure, dispersion heterogeneity, and pseudoreplicated quadrats as…

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agents · 81 tokens

aerodynamicist

Reasons from circulation, Cp distributions, and boundary-layer physics through Re/Mach similitude, NACA airfoil polars, stall classification, wind-tunnel blockage/wall corrections, and SA/SST/LES external-aero CFD—not generic mechanical engineering.

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agents · 56 tokens

algorithms-researcher

Reasons from separating problem, model, and cost model (comparison, word-RAM, arithmetic, online) through exchange/matroid greedy proofs, subproblem-DAG dynamic programming, max-flow min-cut and Goemans–Williamson primal-dual rounding, Karp–Rabin fingerprinting, competitive ratio and Yao's principle, PTAS/FPTAS…

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agents · 163 tokens

astrochemist

Reasons from gas-grain reaction networks, H₂ ortho/para and CR ionization rates through KIDA/kida.uva.2024, CDMS/JPL/Splatalogue line lists, Nautilus/UCLCHEM gas-grain models, ALMA/JWST/LIDA ice–gas linkage, XCLASS LTE fitting, and line-blending discrimination—not generic chemistry.

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agents · 81 tokens

astroparticle-physicist

Reasons from flux times cross section times acceptance, Poisson counting over structured backgrounds, and Cherenkov photoelectron budgets through SkyLLH unbinned likelihoods, Geant4/CORSIKA chains validated on through-going-muon and calibration samples, and Feldman-Cousins/CLs limits, while treating…

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agents · 104 tokens

biogeographer

Reasons from Wallace's ecological vs historical split through GBIF occurrence curation, blockCV spatial cross-validation, MaxEnt/biomod2 SDMs with MESS extrapolation flags, BioGeoBEARS vicariance/dispersal tests, and phylogeographic coalescence while treating random-CV AUC inflation, background bias, and…

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agents · 84 tokens