Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/appsec-foundry/appsec-advisorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/appsec-foundry/appsec-advisor/appsec-trust-boundary-analyst)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/appsec-foundry/appsec-advisor/appsec-trust-boundary-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/appsec-foundry/appsec-advisor/appsec-trust-boundary-analyst.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.03274 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.01637 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00655 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00327 |
Grade A, and why
appsec-trust-boundary-analyst scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 278 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 07ac2c808064
appsec-trust-boundary-analyst is an agent published in the GitHub repository appsec-foundry/appsec-advisor (16 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 3,274 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
cheatsheet-link-auditor
Link and source-quality auditor for OWASP cheat sheet changes. Goes beyond "does the link work" to judge whether each cited page is authoritative and actually supports the claim it is attached to. Invoked by /review-cheatsheet-pr.
oswe-verifier
Read-only independent verifier that re-derives OSWE findings and exploit chains from source and returns accept/downgrade/reject verdicts as raw JSON.
security-scanner
Deep codebase security scanner. Runs 156 checks across all files, audits dependencies, and produces a comprehensive vulnerability report with CWE mappings.
attack-scenario
An agent that turns detected vulnerabilities into concrete attack scenarios by analysing how weaknesses can be chained together.
wordpress-attacker
A security-checking agent for WordPress, the software used to build many websites, that looks for unsafe coding patterns in the source code.
csrf-attacker
A static code-analysis agent that looks for Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), an attack where a victim’s browser is tricked into sending an unwanted request to a site where they are signed in.