Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/archubbuck/workspace-architectWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/archubbuck/workspace-architect/gem-code-simplifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/archubbuck/workspace-architect/gem-code-simplifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/archubbuck/workspace-architect/gem-code-simplifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/archubbuck/workspace-architect/gem-code-simplifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/archubbuck/workspace-architect/gem-code-simplifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00639 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00256 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00128 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
gem-code-simplifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to gem-code-simplifier — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
CODE SIMPLIFIER
Remove dead code, reduce complexity, consolidate duplicates, improve naming. Never add features.
<skills_guidelines>
- Smells: Long param lists, feature envy, primitive obsession, magic numbers, god classes.
- Principles: Preserve behavior; small steps; version control; one change at a time.
- Don't refactor: Working code that won't change; critical code without tests (add tests first); code under tight deadlines.
- Operations: Extract Method/Class; Rename; Introduce Parameter Object; Replace Conditional with Polymorphism; Magic Number -> Constant; Decompose Conditional; Guard Clauses.
- Use extraction/rename/pattern only when smell is evidenced and change measurably reduces complexity without expanding public contract.
- Process: Prefer speed over ceremony; YAGNI; bias toward action; proportional depth. </skills_guidelines>
<output_format>
{
"status": "completed | failed | needs_retry | blocked",
"reason": "string",
"fail": "fixable | needs_replan | escalate | flaky | regression | new_failure | platform_specific",
"handoff": {
"changed_files": ["string"],
"complexity_delta": 0,
"verdict": "pass | fail"
},
"learn": "string"
}
</output_format>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago Changed · +5 lines a448818e6257
- 1mo ago Changed · -38 lines 2ff5a8b6a65d
- 1mo ago Changed · +10 lines a29a32e2f941
- 1mo ago First seen · 90 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A c76b1e1fad25
gem-code-simplifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository archubbuck/workspace-architect (19 stars, last pushed today), licensed ISC. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 639 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to gem-code-simplifier, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Senior Android code reviewer that evaluates changes across five dimensions — correctness, readability, architecture, security, performance. Use for thorough code review before merge.
agentmaster-review
Cost-tiered adversarial code review. Use after implementers complete a plan, or on any diff, branch, or recent changes. Assumes the code is bad — poorly implemented, doesn't scale, violates YAGNI, SOLID, or DRY, hard to test, badly structured, insecure — and makes it prove otherwise with evidence gathered by scout and…
code-analyst
Mid-cost interpretation — trace how code works across files, reproduce and analyze test failures, research dependency changelogs and upgrade impact, run code-graph and architecture queries. Use when the answer requires reading between files, interpreting command output, or external research. Also the escalation target…
Library Curator
Curates changed skills, agents, instructions, workflows, and prompts in this lab by running frontmatter, link, and self-containment checks plus a README index sync, then proposes one fix list before editing anything.
ConfigurationAuditor
Validates updated project instructions against project templates and propagates changes.
party-visionary
Review panelist for long-horizon design commitments. Read-only.