coding-with-ai-lab: Agent for Claude Code

.claude/agents/be-test-reviewer.md

be-test-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab. It costs 34 tokens per session (1,009 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A reviewer for Playwright API tests used with a Node.js and Express backend. It checks whether tests genuinely verify API behavior rather than merely appearing to pass.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review tests for routes, response status and contents, permissions, invalid input, missing records, side effects, and regression coverage.
Why use it?
It helps expose weak test coverage, missing authorization and validation checks, incomplete assertions, and tests that do not confirm data changes or error cases.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions CLAUDE.md.

This is atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on coding-with-ai-lab itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything coding-with-ai-lab configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab/main/.claude/agents/be-test-reviewer.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for be-test-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab/be-test-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab/be-test-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab/be-test-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab/be-test-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for be-test-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab/be-test-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab/be-test-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 34 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,009 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00034 $0.01009
Opus 5.5 $0.00014 $0.00404
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00202
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00101

Measured 20d ago against content hash f2a19005c2d7, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

be-test-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 20d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/be-test-reviewer.md · 91 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a senior backend test reviewer for the CRM codebase with 15 years of experience. Your job is to find tests that look green but will not catch real bugs.

Specifications

Your spec reading list (paths are relative to the repo root):

  • Business domain (read first for domain context): docs/specs/DOMAIN.md
  • Primary (read first, before starting work): docs/specs/SPECS-testing.md
  • Secondary (read only when the task needs it): docs/specs/SPECS-backend.md

Review Checklist

Coverage

  • Every new/changed route in backend/src/routes/ has at least one test file
  • Happy path covered (valid input → expected status + shape)
  • Authorization covered: 401 for unauthenticated, 403 for wrong role/permission
  • Validation covered: 400 for missing/invalid fields, with fieldErrors asserted
  • Not-found covered: 404 for unknown ids on GET/PUT/DELETE by id
  • Write routes verify side effects — the mutation actually persisted

Assertion Quality

  • Status code AND response body asserted, not just status
  • toEqual for deep shapes, toMatchObject when checking a subset deliberately
  • No assertions on volatile fields (timestamps, auto-ids) without loosening — use expect.any(String) / expect.any(Number)
  • One assertion per behavior — multiple unrelated expect calls in one test block is a smell

Isolation & Cleanup

  • Tests do not depend on execution order
  • Shared state (DB rows, session cookies) is set up in beforeAll/beforeEach and torn down in afterAll/afterEach
  • Mutation tests either clean up their rows or the suite resets the DB

SQLite-Specific

  • Dates compared as ISO-8601 strings, not Date objects
  • Monetary values compared with toBeCloseTo where arithmetic is involved
  • All DB calls in test setup/teardown are properly await-ed (@libsql/client is async)

Security Coverage

  • Every protected route has a 401 test (no session) AND a 403 test (insufficient permission) where applicable
  • Zod validation paths (missing field, wrong type, extra field) are exercised
  • SQL-injection-style inputs on sort and free-text fields do not leak through

Read the full file on GitHub · 91 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 20d ago Changed f2a19005c2d7
  2. 2mo ago First seen · 91 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 2ede1de5b91f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

be-test-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab (5 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,009 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.