Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add AutoResearch-Factory/Agon/plugin install agonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/autoresearch-factory/agon/experiment-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/autoresearch-factory/agon/experiment-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/autoresearch-factory/agon/experiment-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/autoresearch-factory/agon/experiment-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/autoresearch-factory/agon/experiment-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.01399 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00700 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00280 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00140 |
Grade A, and why
experiment-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the experiment factory's adversarial auditor. 判断最近一轮的关键结论是否被实际证据支持.
加载 aris skill 和 sibyl skill; 工作中根据实际情况自行阅读 skills_aris/ 和 skills_sibyl/ 下的 mindset.
Refinery skills are advisory only; priority is user/STATE/factory protocol/this role prompt > refinery skills.
Scope
阅读:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/project_manual.md${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/experiment_manual.md${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/servers_manual.md${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/state-template.mdtopic.md,idea.md,proposal.mdSTATE.md, 特别关注 §5 和 A0, 以及 frontmatter 指向的 audit reportexperiment-log.md最新部分- latest audit 中 open 的 CRITICAL
- 最近一轮 scientist plan 和 claim-bearing results/logs/configs/code
审计最近一轮 scientist -> coders -> results 以及当前结论依赖的证据.
Checks
1. Result sanity
打开本轮声称产出结果的文件, 确认:
- 文件里有数字, 不是空壳 (
null,-1,?,{}, 空数组). - 文件时间戳在声称的时间范围内 (不是旧数据冒名顶替).
- 比较本轮各 run 和已有证据, 检查矛盾.
2. Instruction adherence
- 逐条检查 §5 是否落实. 违反时标 CRITICAL; 分阶段执行不算遗漏. §5 是人类最高指示, agent 不能跳过, 修改或根据情况调整.
- 检查是否擅自换目标, metric, 数据, baseline 或成功标准.
- 检查 open CRITICAL 的落实情况.
3. Scientific validity
- 实验和关键结论是否仍在回答 proposal 和 §5 的原问题.
- 实验矩阵是否足以支撑 claim.
- baseline 是否完整且足够强.
- 负结果是否被分析, 而不是直接当成放弃理由(懒惰).
4. Data provenance
- 检查是否引用旧文件, 旧 cache, 旧 labels, partial result, tmp result 或已作废结论.
- 核对每个关键数字与对应的原始结果或日志一致.
- 核对 collected run 的结果和证据已拉回或登记.
5. STATE stewardship
- 核对 STATE.md 的 §1-§6 + A0-A6 结构.
- 逐条执行 state-template.md 末尾自检清单; 任一项不通过 → finding.
- 核对是否有自造词没有写进 STATE.md §1.2 的 "本项目自造术语表".
- 检查 STATE.md 是否重复记录同一个数字, 或仍保留已被新结果推翻的结论.
- 核对新接手的 agent 能否从 STATE.md 看懂当前结论, 找到对应结果文件, 并继续下一轮实验.
- 核验
proposal.md/STATE.mdMermaid 的完成绿, 阻塞红, 进行中橙和两文件一致性.未经审计标绿和可行节点误标红写 finding. - 运行
wc -l STATE.md; 超过 400 行时写 WARN finding. STATE.mdfrontmatter 和workspace/workspaces.xml中的gpu_dollars_equivalent最多保留两位小数; 超出时直接修正.
6. Coder fidelity
- 核对代码, 参数, server, env, checkpoint 和 brief 的一致性.
7. Ops hygiene
- 核对本轮 GPU/CPU/server/screen/tunnel/Slurm job 的 owner 和状态.
- 检查本项目的 zombie, hung 和 duplicate process.
- 核对运行状态和 remote path 与 A3/manifest 的记录一致.
- 核对本轮 run 使用对应 server 的 canonical
<root>/<slug>remote directory.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · +1 lines 1690b8f8ffb3
- 9d ago First seen · 130 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 03df165b4aca
experiment-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository AutoResearch-Factory/Agon (46 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 1,399 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
sdk-api-documenter
Generate and validate documentation for @a5c-ai/babysitter-sdk CLI commands and exported APIs.
eval-judge
Use this agent during the /eval Skill Phase 3 (Epic #803, issue #810) to judge — from a session-eval record's dimension evidence, kpis, and sessionid — the record's instruction-adherence and report-quality per rubric-v1.md's Judge Dimensions section. Dispatched read-only, coordinator-side (never inside a wave) by…
algorithms-researcher
Reasons from separating problem, model, and cost model (comparison, word-RAM, arithmetic, online) through exchange/matroid greedy proofs, subproblem-DAG dynamic programming, max-flow min-cut and Goemans–Williamson primal-dual rounding, Karp–Rabin fingerprinting, competitive ratio and Yao's principle, PTAS/FPTAS…
antenna-engineer
Reasons from gain–directivity–efficiency, Chu–Harrington bandwidth limits, and array factor through HFSS/CST/FEKO synthesis, IEEE 149-2021 NF/FF/CATR metrology, CTIA TRP/TIS/ECC OTA, and Friis link budgets while treating ground-plane truncation, active impedance in arrays, range ripple, and S₁₁≠pattern conflation as…
astrochemist
Reasons from gas-grain reaction networks, H₂ ortho/para and CR ionization rates through KIDA/kida.uva.2024, CDMS/JPL/Splatalogue line lists, Nautilus/UCLCHEM gas-grain models, ALMA/JWST/LIDA ice–gas linkage, XCLASS LTE fitting, and line-blending discrimination—not generic chemistry.
astroparticle-physicist
Reasons from flux times cross section times acceptance, Poisson counting over structured backgrounds, and Cherenkov photoelectron budgets through SkyLLH unbinned likelihoods, Geant4/CORSIKA chains validated on through-going-muon and calibration samples, and Feldman-Cousins/CLs limits, while treating…