AIDLC Design Reviewer is an agent-native design review workflow that guides an AI coding assistant through critique, alternatives, and gap analysis, then produces a quality score and Markdown or HTML reports. It is for reviewing software designs inside supported coding assistants without requiring Bedrock or AWS. Its catalogue add-ons install the workflow into those assistants.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aws-samples/sample-aidlc-design-reviewerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/aws-samples/sample-aidlc-design-reviewer/design-gap.head)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aws-samples/sample-aidlc-design-reviewer/design-gap.head"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aws-samples/sample-aidlc-design-reviewer/design-gap.head.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.00071 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00036 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00014 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00007 |
Grade A, and why
design-gap scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed MIT-0
The repository is licensed MIT-0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 7 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A f693c0b0053c
design-gap is an agent published in the GitHub repository aws-samples/sample-aidlc-design-reviewer (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT-0. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 71 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
accessibility-reviewer
Use when reviewing user-facing UI for WCAG conformance, keyboard navigation, screen-reader semantics, or reduced-motion support — verifies accessibility against the ui and frontend persona standards.
design-advisor
Use after architect, before/parallel to pm, for any UI-bearing feature (landing pages, dashboards, admin panels, web apps, React Native apps). Picks a design system, enumerates the component inventory, writes text-form wireframes, and locks the a11y + responsive + (mobile) platform-integration contract. Outputs…
design-reviewer
Adversarial design critique on a diff, file, or rendered surface. Use to review UI/design quality or audit a diff/PR for design issues. One of a parallel verify team alongside a11y-auditor.
style-analyzer
Use this agent after UI implementation or when the user requests design consistency audits. Ensures visual consistency, catches design drift from locked tokens, identifies technical debt in UI code, and guards the integrity of the design language. Context: Multiple UI components were built during the cycle. user…
motion-reviewer
Audits motion and animation against this starter's rules — spring usage, the narrow CSS-transition exception, text-engine traps, reduced-motion behaviour and per-frame cost. Use when reviewing animation-heavy work or when motion feels wrong.
review-ui-ux
A review agent for user interfaces, the parts of software people see and operate. It checks accessibility, keyboard use, design consistency, wording, and responsive behavior, or gives design advice before implementation.