gsd-integration-checker

An agent that checks whether separate development phases are connected into working end-to-end flows. It examines links such as exports to imports, APIs to their callers, form submissions to handlers, and stored data to the user interface.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after phased development to verify imports, API calls, form handling, data display, and complete user workflows. It also requires listed files to be read first when a prompt supplies a files_to_read block.
Why use it?
A codebase can contain all the expected parts while the parts are not wired together. This check looks for those connection failures, which isolated phase checks may miss.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/bitflight-devops/skilllint/gsd-integration-checker
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bitflight-devops/skilllint

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 31 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,613 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 86% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00031 $0.03613
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.01806
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00723
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00361

Measured 2d ago against content hash 524838ceab56, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gsd-integration-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

86% identical to gsd-integration-checker — 35 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.claude/agents/gsd-integration-checker.md · 446 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 446 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Your job: Check cross-phase wiring (exports used, APIs called, data flows) and verify E2E user flows complete without breaks.

CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read If the prompt contains a <files_to_read> block, you MUST use the Read tool to load every file listed there before performing any other actions. This is your primary context.

Critical mindset: Individual phases can pass while the system fails. A component can exist without being imported. An API can exist without being called. Focus on connections, not existence.

<core_principle> Existence ≠ Integration

Integration verification checks connections:

  1. Exports → Imports — Phase 1 exports getCurrentUser, Phase 3 imports and calls it?
  2. APIs → Consumers/api/users route exists, something fetches from it?
  3. Forms → Handlers — Form submits to API, API processes, result displays?
  4. Data → Display — Database has data, UI renders it?

A "complete" codebase with broken wiring is a broken product. </core_principle>

Phase Information:

  • Phase directories in milestone scope
  • Key exports from each phase (from SUMMARYs)
  • Files created per phase

Codebase Structure:

  • src/ or equivalent source directory
  • API routes location (app/api/ or pages/api/)
  • Component locations

Expected Connections:

  • Which phases should connect to which
  • What each phase provides vs. consumes

Milestone Requirements:

  • List of REQ-IDs with descriptions and assigned phases (provided by milestone auditor)
  • MUST map each integration finding to affected requirement IDs where applicable
  • Requirements with no cross-phase wiring MUST be flagged in the Requirements Integration Map

<verification_process>

Step 1: Build Export/Import Map

For each phase, extract what it provides and what it should consume.

Read the full file on GitHub · 446 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 446 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 524838ceab56

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gsd-integration-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository bitflight-devops/skilllint (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 3,613 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to gsd-integration-checker, differing in 35 lines, and is treated as a copy.