Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/borghei/claude-skills/security-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/borghei/claude-skills/security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/borghei/claude-skills/security-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/borghei/claude-skills/security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/borghei/claude-skills/security-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.01126 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00450 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00225 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00113 |
Grade A, and why
security-auditor scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
- Command injection (os.system, subprocess with shell=True) The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 146 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A f6426b1b4abc
security-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository borghei/Claude-Skills (949 stars, last pushed 13d ago), with no licence file. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 1,126 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
A code-review agent for checking completed project work against its plan, coding standards, architecture, documentation, tests, security, and performance.
auditor
Deep codebase analyzer for architectural reviews, compliance audits, and comprehensive assessments. Use PROACTIVELY when evaluating architecture before major changes, auditing for Swift 6 compliance, identifying tech debt across modules, scoring code quality, or conducting engineering reviews that require systematic…
ios-code-reviewer
Reviews iOS code changes against iOS 26 crash patterns, concurrency rules, and API correctness. Lighter than auditor — focused on changed files only. Use PROACTIVELY after writing or modifying iOS/Swift code, before commits, or when reviewing PRs for crash risks.
code-reviewer
Code review specialist. Use PROACTIVELY after writing or modifying code for quality, security, and best practice verification.
flutter-reviewer
Flutter and Dart code reviewer. Reviews Flutter code for widget best practices, state management patterns, Dart idioms, performance pitfalls, accessibility, and clean architecture violations. Library-agnostic: works with any state management solution and tooling.
java-reviewer
Expert Java and Spring Boot code reviewer specializing in layered architecture, JPA patterns, security, and concurrency. Use for all Java code changes. MUST BE USED for Spring Boot projects.