Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/markdavidgan/apple-dev-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/markdavidgan/apple-dev-skills/ios-code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/markdavidgan/apple-dev-skills/ios-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/markdavidgan/apple-dev-skills/ios-code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/markdavidgan/apple-dev-skills/ios-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/markdavidgan/apple-dev-skills/ios-code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.01186 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00474 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00237 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00119 |
Grade A, and why
ios-code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Reviews iOS code against iOS 26 crash patterns and corrected API signatures. Lighter than auditor — focuses on changed files, not entire codebase.
Provider Model Equivalents
Tier: Fast — pattern matching against known crash patterns, not deep analysis.
| Provider | Model | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Claude | claude-sonnet-4-6, effort: low |
Default; fast pattern matching |
| GPT | gpt-4.1-mini |
|
| Gemini | gemini-3.1-flash |
|
| Kimi CLI | kimi-for-coding |
When to Use
- After writing/modifying Swift code — quick crash risk check before commit
- Reviewing PRs — check changed files for iOS 26 compliance
- Pre-commit gate — verify no hallucinated APIs or crash patterns
When NOT to Use
- Full codebase audit → use
auditorinstead - Build failures → use
build-agentinstead - Finding files → use
exploreinstead
Review Protocol
Step 1: Identify Scope
- Get the list of changed Swift files (from git diff, PR, or user input)
- Only review changed files, not the entire codebase
Step 2: Detect Frameworks
Scan import statements in changed files. Map to essentials:
| Import | Load |
|---|---|
import SwiftUI |
ios26-api-reference/essentials/swiftui.md |
import SwiftData |
ios26-api-reference/essentials/swiftdata.md |
import FoundationModels |
ios26-api-reference/essentials/foundation-models.md |
import Speech |
ios26-api-reference/essentials/speech.md |
import AVFoundation |
ios26-api-reference/essentials/avfoundation.md |
import WidgetKit / ActivityKit |
ios26-api-reference/essentials/widgets.md |
import AppIntents |
ios26-api-reference/essentials/app-intents.md |
import Vision |
ios26-api-reference/essentials/vision.md |
import VideoToolbox |
ios26-api-reference/essentials/videotoolbox.md |
import Network |
ios26-api-reference/essentials/network.md |
| Any Swift file | ios26-api-reference/essentials/swift6.md (always) |
Step 3: Pattern Match
For each changed file, check against the loaded essentials:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 112 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A 2add83e6f50c
ios-code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository markdavidgan/apple-dev-skills (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 1,186 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
swiftui-expert
Read-only SwiftUI expert. Use when reviewing SwiftUI layout, navigation, state, observation, gestures, animation, previews, Dynamic Type, iPad adaptation, performance, or modern iOS 27 SwiftUI APIs. Reports recommendations and does not edit code.
security-auditor
Performs comprehensive security audits on code and configuration. Use proactively before deployments, after adding new dependencies, or when handling sensitive data flows. Checks OWASP Top 10, dependency vulnerabilities, secrets exposure, and infrastructure security.
code-reviewer
Reviews code for quality, security, performance, and best practices. Use proactively after code changes, before commits, or when reviewing PRs. Identifies bugs, anti-patterns, security vulnerabilities, and suggests improvements.
ios-code-reviewer
Use this agent when you need to review Swift/iOS code for quality, best practices, and potential issues. This agent should be invoked:\n\nProactive Usage Examples:\n- After implementing a new feature or component\n- After refactoring existing code\n- Before submitting a pull request\n- After making architectural…
harmonyos-app-resolver
HarmonyOS application development expert specializing in ArkTS and ArkUI. Reviews code for V2 state management compliance, Navigation routing patterns, API usage, and performance best practices. Use for HarmonyOS/OpenHarmony projects.
code-reviewer
Senior iOS code reviewer focused on eight dimensions including the agent-specific patterns that make AI-written code obviously AI-written. Use when reviewing Claude Code's output before merging, when doing a quality pass before TestFlight, or when you want a second opinion on generated code.