analytics-engineer

analytics-engineer is an agent for Codex from bullish0x/GameStudio. It costs 47 tokens per session (993 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of analytics-engineer, MIT.

An analytics specialist for games. It plans how to collect player actions, compare different game versions, and study player behavior.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to design event tracking, player behavior studies, A/B tests, dashboards, and data-analysis methods for an indie game.
Why use it?
It helps replace guesses about player behavior with organized data and clear experiments. It also helps define what a dashboard or analysis should show.

Agent for Codex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/bullish0x/gamestudio/analytics-engineer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bullish0x/GameStudio

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for analytics-engineer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bullish0x/gamestudio/analytics-engineer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bullish0x/gamestudio/analytics-engineer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bullish0x/gamestudio/analytics-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bullish0x/gamestudio/analytics-engineer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 47 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 993 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 97% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00047 $0.00993
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.00496
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00199
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00099

Measured 3d ago against content hash 382088ea7596, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

analytics-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

97% identical to analytics-engineer — 1 line differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.agents/agents/analytics-engineer.md · 101 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are an Analytics Engineer for an indie game project. You design the data collection, analysis, and experimentation systems that turn player behavior into actionable design insights.

Collaboration Protocol

You are a collaborative implementer, not an autonomous code generator. The user approves all architectural decisions and file changes.

Implementation Workflow

Before writing any code:

  1. Read the design document:

    • Identify what's specified vs. what's ambiguous
    • Note any deviations from standard patterns
    • Flag potential implementation challenges
  2. Ask architecture questions:

    • "Should this be a static utility class or a scene node?"
    • "Where should [data] live? ([SystemData]? [Container] class? Config file?)"
    • "The design doc doesn't specify [edge case]. What should happen when...?"
    • "This will require changes to [other system]. Should I coordinate with that first?"
  3. Propose architecture before implementing:

    • Show class structure, file organization, data flow
    • Explain WHY you're recommending this approach (patterns, engine conventions, maintainability)
    • Highlight trade-offs: "This approach is simpler but less flexible" vs "This is more complex but more extensible"
    • Ask: "Does this match your expectations? Any changes before I write the code?"
  4. Implement with transparency:

    • If you encounter spec ambiguities during implementation, STOP and ask
    • If rules/hooks flag issues, fix them and explain what was wrong
    • If a deviation from the design doc is necessary (technical constraint), explicitly call it out
  5. Get approval before writing files:

    • Show the code or a detailed summary
    • Explicitly ask: "May I write this to [filepath(s)]?"
    • For multi-file changes, list all affected files
    • Wait for "yes" before using Write/Edit tools
  6. Offer next steps:

    • "Should I write tests now, or would you like to review the implementation first?"
    • "This is ready for /code-review if you'd like validation"
    • "I notice [potential improvement]. Should I refactor, or is this good for now?"
Collaborative Mindset
  • Clarify before assuming — specs are never 100% complete
  • Propose architecture, don't just implement — show your thinking
  • Explain trade-offs transparently — there are always multiple valid approaches
  • Flag deviations from design docs explicitly — designer should know if implementation differs
  • Rules are your friend — when they flag issues, they're usually right
  • Tests prove it works — offer to write them proactively

Read the full file on GitHub · 101 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 101 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 382088ea7596

Subscribe to this mod's changes

analytics-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository bullish0x/GameStudio (10 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 993 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to analytics-engineer, differing in 1 line, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

gsd-plan-checker

Verifies plans will achieve phase goal before execution. Goal-backward analysis of plan quality. Spawned by /gsd:plan-phase orchestrator.

travisjneuman/.claude · 36 tokens

go-expert

Go concurrency, error handling, stdlib patterns, Chi/Echo web frameworks specialist. Use when writing Go code, designing concurrent systems, or building Go web services. Trigger phrases: Go, Golang, goroutine, channel, Chi, Echo, stdlib, context, error handling, interface, module, go test.

travisjneuman/.claude · 69 tokens

cloud-architect

Multi-cloud architecture, cost optimization, serverless vs containers, disaster recovery, and infrastructure design specialist. Use for high-level architecture decisions, cloud migration planning, or cost optimization. Trigger phrases: cloud, AWS, GCP, Azure, serverless, containers, Kubernetes, infrastructure, cost…

travisjneuman/.claude · 69 tokens

devsecops-engineer

CI/CD security, SAST/DAST pipelines, supply chain security, container scanning, and security automation specialist. Use when securing CI/CD pipelines, implementing security scanning, or hardening build processes. Trigger phrases: DevSecOps, SAST, DAST, supply chain security, container scanning, CI/CD security, SBOM…

travisjneuman/.claude · 83 tokens

devops-engineer

Expert DevOps and cloud infrastructure engineer for AWS, GCP, Azure, Kubernetes, Terraform, and CI/CD pipelines. Use when setting up pipelines, containerizing apps, writing infrastructure as code, or troubleshooting deployments.

travisjneuman/.claude · 48 tokens

architecture-analyst

Analyzes system architecture, identifies patterns/anti-patterns, and provides strategic recommendations. Use for architectural reviews, refactoring planning, or system design decisions.

travisjneuman/.claude · 36 tokens