chorus-proposal-reviewer

chorus-proposal-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from Chorus-AIDLC/Chorus. It costs 51 tokens per session (4,203 once invoked), scanned A, original, AGPL-3.0.

A review assistant for Chorus proposals that checks their completeness, task size, acceptance criteria, and dependencies between tasks. Acceptance criteria are the specific conditions a task must meet to count as complete.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after submitting a Chorus project proposal. It reviews the proposal documents, breaks down task quality, checks alignment with the required outcomes, and identifies cross-task dependencies.
Why use it?
It catches vague, oversized, incomplete, or poorly connected tasks before implementation begins. This makes the proposed work easier to build and assess.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md).

Good fit Use it after submitting a Chorus project proposal. It reviews the proposal documents, breaks down task quality, checks alignment with the required outcomes, and identifies cross-task dependencies.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/chorus-aidlc/chorus/chorus-proposal-reviewer
About the project

Chorus is a coordination harness for teams of coding agents and humans, combining agent orchestration, task tracking, permissions, observability, and recovery in one workflow. It is for collaborative software development where agents propose changes and people verify them before delivery, and the catalogue entries provide its skills, hooks, agents, commands, MCP integration, plugin, and configuration.

Chorus-AIDLC/Chorus · 1,210 stars · on GitHub · chorus-ai.dev

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Chorus-AIDLC/Chorus

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for chorus-proposal-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chorus-aidlc/chorus/chorus-proposal-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/chorus-aidlc/chorus/chorus-proposal-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/chorus-aidlc/chorus/chorus-proposal-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chorus-aidlc/chorus/chorus-proposal-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for chorus-proposal-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/chorus-aidlc/chorus/chorus-proposal-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chorus-aidlc/chorus/chorus-proposal-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 51 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 4,203 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00051 $0.04203
Opus 5.5 $0.00020 $0.01681
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00010 $0.00841
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00420

Measured 3d ago against content hash 9e11fde1021f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

chorus-proposal-reviewer scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

Use `chorus_review` for ALL Chorus data access — no curl, raw HTTP, CLI wrappers or other gateways. First call `chorus_review({ action: "discover" })` to obtain allowed operations and their actual schemas. Then call `cho
packages/chorus-pi/agents/chorus-proposal-reviewer.md · 196 lines

The source is not reproduced here

Licensed AGPL-3.0

The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago Changed · +1 lines 9e11fde1021f
  2. 16d ago Changed · +3 lines 46705825cb6a
  3. 21d ago Changed c8ec825f1bc3
  4. 1mo ago Changed · +52 lines · +7 tokens per session 3611d3e01347
  5. 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 1ef55cb8f1f3
  6. 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 940d7f1126eb
  7. 1mo ago First seen · 138 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 7a67b49ae0f3

Subscribe to this mod's changes

chorus-proposal-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Chorus-AIDLC/Chorus (1,210 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 4,203 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

task-manager

Ask to track work items for this session — create tasks, list them by status, update progress, assign to agents, and add comments.

prime-radiant-inc/sprout · 30 tokens

pm-planner

PM requirements analysis, task decomposition, API contract definition agent.

first-fluke/oh-my-agent · 15 tokens

bt6-issue-steward

Triages and responds to issues across BT6 research and support repositories using evidence, tracker authority, and explicit mutation gates.

elder-plinius/T3MP3ST · 32 tokens

Realista od wysyłki

Ekspert Pragmatyk jest głosem rzeczywistości operacyjnej w debacie Five Minds - jego misja to sprowadzenie ambitnych pomysłów do realiów budżetu, zespołu, deadlinu i zdolności wykonawczej. Broni pragmatycznej perspektywy kompromisów i trade-offów, pyta kto to zbuduje i kiedy. Działa w fazie debate1 protokołu.

TheJacksonCode/Agent-Architecture · 104 tokens

general-coo

COO General — operations owner. Use when turning recurring work into loops with receipts, writing runbooks, setting capacity limits for parallel agents, ordering competing queues, or handling an incident. Runs the daily and weekly ops pulses.

frankxai/agentic-creator-os · 49 tokens

hardware-pm

Use when leading hardware NPI (New Product Introduction) projects, tracking EVT/DVT/PVT milestones, managing BOM and factory timelines, or coordinating the Hardware Council under PM direction. Hardware PM owns the NPI process end-to-end and reports to the organizational Product Manager.

10Legs/freelance-developer-harness · 58 tokens