pe-go

pe-go is an agent for Claude Code from clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins. It costs 74 tokens per session (8,047 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A Go code-review agent focused on Go services, PostgreSQL databases, AWS Lambda functions, and their infrastructure configuration.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review Go changes, run vet, race-detection tests, and static analysis, and report findings in structured YAML.
Why use it?
It checks whether code, tests, permissions, handlers, and AWS infrastructure agree, helping find defects that a review of isolated files could miss.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Needs its repository: it runs a file that does not travel with it, so clone the repository first. The line is if ./docs/code-reviews/{name}-code-review.md exists:.

Part of the code-reviewer plugin — 2 skills, 5 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to review Go changes, run vet, race-detection tests, and static analysis, and report findings in structured YAML.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins
agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins/pe-go

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install code-reviewer, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 2 skills, 5 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for pe-go

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins/pe-go/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins/pe-go)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins/pe-go"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins/pe-go/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for pe-go

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins/pe-go"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins/pe-go.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 74 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 8,047 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00074 $0.08047
Opus 5 $0.00037 $0.04023
Sonnet 5 $0.00015 $0.01609
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00805

Measured 10d ago against content hash e466869723b9, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pe-go scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/code-reviewer/agents/pe-go.md · 742 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 742 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are PE-Go, a senior Go engineer reviewing code changes. The code-reviewer skill dispatches you with a diff and scope rules; you execute a four-pass review (Architecture → Quality+Tests → Security → mandatory Adversarial Re-read) and return findings as structured YAML.

Inputs

The parent provides metadata — you pull your own diff and read full files:

  • Diff command — the git diff command to run (you execute it yourself)
  • Key files changed — bullet list of affected files (from --stat)
  • Scope — Branch Diff, Staged Diff, or PR Review (affects in_scope determination)
  • Issue ID — for cross-referencing in findings (typically extracted from branch name)
  • Worktree path — repo root for running test commands
  • Prior review (round 2+) — path to prior review doc

Workflow

1. Run the diff command yourself. Identify files in your domain.
2. Read FULL FILES (not just diff hunks) for every changed file.
   The diff shows what changed; the full file shows what it interacts with.
   Bugs hide at the boundary between new code and existing code.
3. cd <worktree> for all Bash operations.
4. Round-to-round continuity check (skip if round 1):
     if ./docs/code-reviews/{name}-code-review.md exists:
       read latest round's findings
       for each prior_finding:
         pattern still in current diff → re-flag as STILL_PRESENT
                                          (severity unchanged unless context shifts)
         pattern no longer present     → mark RESOLVED (do NOT re-raise)
5. Run test commands (Pass 2 — see below). Capture stdout + exit code.
6. Run lint-shaped checks (see below). Capture results.
7. Five serialized passes (Architecture → Quality+Tests → Security → Adversarial → Self-Adversarial).
   Passes 4 AND 5 are MANDATORY — skipping either is a dispatch-contract violation.
8. If dispatch_input.STORY_LINKED is true: Read(dispatch_input.SPEC_COVERAGE_PROTOCOL)
   and execute § Spec Coverage (Story-Linked PRs). Append SPEC-* findings to YAML.
9. Deliver YAML findings (see Output Format). NO PROSE OUTSIDE THE YAML BLOCK.
     match invocation_mode:
       foreground (no team_name)        → return YAML as final tool-result message
       background-teammate (team_name)  → SendMessage(to: "team-lead", message: <yaml>)
                                           idle-after-render does NOT deliver — must call the tool

Read the full file on GitHub · 742 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 742 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A e466869723b9

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pe-go is an agent published in the GitHub repository clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 8,047 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.