Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Dipen-Dedania/agent-pulse. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Dipen-Dedania/agent-pulse/main/.claude/agents/ux-auditor.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dipen-Dedania/agent-pulseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dipen-dedania/agent-pulse/ux-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dipen-dedania/agent-pulse/ux-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dipen-dedania/agent-pulse/ux-auditor.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.01881 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00941 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00376 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00188 |
Grade A, and why
ux-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 78 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A ac41e255d0df
ux-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository Dipen-Dedania/agent-pulse (10 stars, last pushed 7d ago), with no licence file. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 1,881 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Accessibility Reviewer
Audit UI components for WCAG 2.2 compliance, semantic HTML, ARIA labels, keyboard navigation, color contrast, and responsive design.
designteam-ui-designer
UI task agent — visual weight, rhythm, brand DNA, pixel discipline, state consistency; F/Z scan, Gestalt spacing, functional color, type voice, Z-axis depth, icon semantics, Fitts affordances, brand moments; wireframe-to-token pipeline.
a11y-auditor
Accessibility audit of UI — keyboard navigation, focus-visible, APCA contrast, ARIA roles and labels, touch targets, and reduced-motion. Use to audit a diff, file, or surface for accessibility issues.
ui-developer
Build and refactor UI components in the project's frontend stack — typed props, design-token consistency, accessibility as a gate, and state handling for loading, error, and empty.
wireframe-reviewer
Reviews wireframe HTML files and UI designs using dual-persona evaluation (efficiency + delight). Scores out of 100 with actionable feedback. Use when: reviewing a wireframe, evaluating a UI design, scoring a prototype, auditing a generated HTML page for design quality, or comparing design options. Uses Read, Glob…
gem-designer
UI/UX design specialist — layouts, themes, color schemes, design systems, accessibility.