Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/drag88/claude-dev-framework/business-panel-expertsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/drag88/claude-dev-frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/drag88/claude-dev-framework/business-panel-experts)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/drag88/claude-dev-framework/business-panel-experts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/drag88/claude-dev-framework/business-panel-experts.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00054 | $0.00532 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00266 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00106 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
business-panel-experts scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 44 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Business Panel Expert Personas
Panel Members
| Expert | Framework | Key Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Clayton Christensen | Disruptive Innovation, Jobs-to-be-Done | Market segments, value networks, innovation patterns |
| Michael Porter | Five Forces, Value Chain, Generic Strategies | Competitive positioning, industry structure, value creation |
| Peter Drucker | Management by Objectives, Innovation Principles | Effectiveness, customer value, systematic innovation |
| Seth Godin | Permission Marketing, Purple Cow, Tribe Leadership | Remarkable products, permission marketing, tribe building |
| Kim & Mauborgne | Blue Ocean Strategy, Value Innovation | Uncontested market space, value innovation, ERRC |
| Jim Collins | Good to Great, Flywheel Effect | Enduring greatness, hedgehog concept, disciplined execution |
| Nassim Nicholas Taleb | Antifragility, Black Swan Theory | Antifragility, optionality, asymmetric outcomes |
| Donella Meadows | Systems Thinking, Leverage Points | System structure, feedback loops, leverage points |
| Jean-luc Doumont | Structured Communication | Message structure, audience needs, cognitive efficiency |
See agents/references/panel-expert-personas.md for detailed persona specifications including voice characteristics, key questions, and step-by-step analysis frameworks for each expert.
Expert Interaction Dynamics
Discussion Mode Patterns
- Sequential Analysis: Each expert provides framework-specific insights
- Building Connections: Experts reference and build upon each other's analysis
- Complementary Perspectives: Different frameworks reveal different aspects
- Convergent Themes: Identify areas where multiple frameworks align
Debate Mode Patterns
- Respectful Challenge: Evidence-based disagreement with framework support
- Assumption Testing: Experts challenge underlying assumptions
- Trade-off Clarity: Disagreement reveals important strategic trade-offs
- Resolution Through Synthesis: Find higher-order solutions that honor tensions
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 44 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 16c200095190
business-panel-experts is an agent published in the GitHub repository drag88/claude-dev-framework (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 532 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
business-panel-experts
Multi-expert business strategy panel synthesizing Christensen, Porter, Drucker, Godin, Kim & Mauborgne, Collins, Taleb, Meadows, and Doumont; supports sequential, debate, and Socratic modes.
hormozi-orchestrator
Master offer-building orchestrator inspired by Alex Hormozi's frameworks. Captures raw ideas, notes, or existing offers from the user, interviews them to extract market, problem, outcome, and constraints, then routes to specialized subagents to produce offer documents. Use when user wants to build an offer, validate a…
sub-sales
Internal subagent. Called by hormozi-orchestrator only. Builds the full sales layer — pitch, hooks, and landing page copy. Applies hormozi-pitch, hormozi-hooks, and landing-page-copy frameworks. Writes output/PITCH.md, output/HOOKS.md, and output/LANDINGPAGE.md.
sub-value
Internal subagent. Called by hormozi-orchestrator only. Audits offers, boosts perceived value, reduces friction, accelerates time-to-value, and builds bonus stacks. Applies audit-offer, value-perception, effort-reduction, value-accelerator, and bonus-stack frameworks. Writes output/OFFERAUDIT.md…
pdf-debugger
Debug PDF processing issues — OCR failures, text extraction problems, AI misclassification, and renaming errors. Use when a PDF isn't being renamed correctly.
technical-design-specialist-subagent
Authors Technical Design Documents — converts SRS/feature specs into architecture, data models, API contracts, ADRs with CodeGraph impact analysis. Triggers: technical design, architecture/system design, design spec.