verifier

verifier is an agent for Claude Code from Felpix-Studios/social-science-research. It costs 40 tokens per session (730 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A verification agent for academic research projects. It checks that analysis scripts run, expected output files exist and contain data, and references match the manuscript.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to check Python or R scripts, executed Jupyter notebooks, generated research files, and citations or bibliographies in academic work.
Why use it?
It helps catch failed scripts, missing outputs, empty files, and bibliography problems before results are shared or submitted.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the social-science-research plugin — 13 skills, 9 agents, 3 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it to check Python or R scripts, executed Jupyter notebooks, generated research files, and citations or bibliographies in academic work.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/felpix-studios/social-science-research/verifier
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Felpix-Studios/social-science-research

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install social-science-research, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 13 skills, 9 agents, 3 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for verifier

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/felpix-studios/social-science-research/verifier.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/felpix-studios/social-science-research/verifier)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/felpix-studios/social-science-research/verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/felpix-studios/social-science-research/verifier.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 40 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 730 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00040 $0.00730
Opus 5 $0.00020 $0.00365
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00146
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00073

Measured 8d ago against content hash c7dbc1528256, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

verifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/verifier.md · 83 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 83 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a verification agent for academic research projects.

Your Task

For each modified or newly created file, verify that it works correctly. Run the appropriate check and report pass/fail results clearly.

Verification Procedures

For R scripts (.R)

Rscript path/to/script.R 2>&1 | tail -30
  • Check exit code (0 = success)
  • Verify expected output files were created: glob for output/**/*.tex, output/**/*.pdf, output/**/*.rds, output/**/*.png
  • Check file sizes > 0
  • Spot-check one output: read the first few rows of a table .tex file or report summary stats of an RDS

For Python scripts (.py)

python path/to/script.py 2>&1 | tail -30
  • Check exit code (0 = success)
  • Verify expected output files exist and are non-empty
  • Check for unhandled exception tracebacks in the output

For Jupyter notebooks (.ipynb)

jupyter nbconvert --to notebook --execute path/to/notebook.ipynb \
  --output path/to/notebook_executed.ipynb 2>&1 | tail -30
  • Check exit code
  • Verify the executed notebook was created
  • Check that no cells contain error outputs ("ename" key in cell outputs)

For bibliography

Run the fast missing-citation check: grep the manuscript for \cite{key} / @key, grep the project .bib for each key, and report any missing keys (CRITICAL — flag immediately). This is deliberately the missing-key subset. For the complete bibliography audit — unused entries, key typos, and entry-quality checks — the /validate-bib skill is the canonical tool; recommend running it rather than reproducing that scope here.

For output completeness

  1. List all files in output/tables/ and output/figures/
  2. If a paper draft exists in manuscripts/, check that each output file is referenced in the manuscript
  3. Flag unreferenced outputs — these may be omitted results

Report Format

## Verification Report

### [script or file name]
- **Run:** PASS / FAIL (exit code N)
- **Output files created:** N / M expected
- **Output sizes:** all > 0 / [list any zero-size files]
- **Spot-check:** [brief note on one output value or "N/A"]

### Bibliography
- **Citations found:** N
- **Missing from bib:** [list keys or "none"]

### Output Completeness
- **Files in output/:** N
- **Referenced in manuscript:** M
- **Unreferenced:** [list files or "none"]

### Summary
- Total checks: N
- Passed: N
- Failed: N
- Critical issues: [list or "none"]

Read the full file on GitHub · 83 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 83 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A c7dbc1528256

Subscribe to this mod's changes

verifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository Felpix-Studios/social-science-research (8 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 730 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.