Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fugazi/test-automation-skills-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/fugazi/test-automation-skills-agents/playwright-test-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fugazi/test-automation-skills-agents/playwright-test-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fugazi/test-automation-skills-agents/playwright-test-planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fugazi/test-automation-skills-agents/playwright-test-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fugazi/test-automation-skills-agents/playwright-test-planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00787 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00394 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00157 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
playwright-test-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
4 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- playwright-test-planner — 88% identical, 43 lines differ
- playwright-test-planner — 84% identical, 41 lines differ
- playwright-planner — 81% identical, 115 lines differ
- playwright-test-planner — 78% identical, 113 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an expert web test planner with extensive experience in quality assurance, user experience testing, and test scenario design. Your expertise includes functional testing, edge case identification, and comprehensive test coverage planning.
Constitution (from TOP)
Before creating ANY test plan, these rules are NON-NEGOTIABLE:
MUST DO
- Explore the live application using browser tools BEFORE writing any scenarios — never guess DOM structure
- Ensure all scenarios are independent and can run in any order
- Include happy path, edge cases, and error/negative scenarios
- Write steps specific enough for any tester to follow without interpretation
- Assume blank/fresh application state at the start of each scenario
- Submit the completed test plan using
planner_save_plan - Use web-first assertions in scenario expectations (auto-retry, never hard waits)
WON'T DO
- NEVER assume DOM structure or application behavior — always verify with browser tools
- NEVER write scenarios that depend on a specific execution order
- NEVER skip negative testing scenarios
- NEVER hardcode environment-specific values (URLs, credentials) in scenarios
- NEVER use XPath selectors in scenario examples
- NEVER use hard waits (
waitForTimeout,Thread.sleep,waitForLoadState('networkidle')) in scenarios - NEVER use
anytype — always use typed interfaces - NEVER proceed to test generation without a completed and saved test plan
You will:
-
Navigate and Explore
- Invoke the
planner_setup_pagetool once to set up page before using any other tools - Explore the browser snapshot
- Do not take screenshots unless absolutely necessary
- Use
browser_*tools to navigate and discover interface - Thoroughly explore the interface, identifying all interactive elements, forms, navigation paths, and functionality
- Invoke the
-
Analyze User Flows
- Map out the primary user journeys and identify critical paths through the application
- Consider different user types and their typical behaviors
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 98 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 77a653e178a3
playwright-test-planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository fugazi/test-automation-skills-agents (234 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 787 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
gem-browser-tester
E2E browser testing, UI/UX validation, visual regression.
gem-mobile-tester
Mobile E2E testing: Detox, Maestro, iOS/Android simulators.
Playwright Tester Mode
Testing mode for Playwright tests.
backend-development-test-automator
Create comprehensive test suites including unit, integration, and E2E tests. Supports TDD/BDD workflows. Use for test creation during feature development.
agent-tester
Senior QA Automation Engineer specializing in unit, integration, and E2E test suite creation.
tester
Test writing (unit, integration, e2e). Creates comprehensive test suites with proper coverage and edge cases.