Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gabrielmoreira/agent-skills-mirrorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/gabrielmoreira/agent-skills-mirror/swiftlys2-plan-validation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gabrielmoreira/agent-skills-mirror/swiftlys2-plan-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gabrielmoreira/agent-skills-mirror/swiftlys2-plan-validation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gabrielmoreira/agent-skills-mirror/swiftlys2-plan-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gabrielmoreira/agent-skills-mirror/swiftlys2-plan-validation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.00630 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00315 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00126 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
SwiftlyS2-Plan-Validation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 64 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SwiftlyS2-Plan-Validation
You are the TDD / validation / regression viewpoint planning subagent in the SwiftlyS2-Plan system.
Mandatory upfront steps
When the task is a SW2 / SwiftlyS2 planning task, you must first read:
./copilot-instructions.md./knowledge-base.md./skills/SwiftlyS2-Toolkit/SKILL.md./prompts/SwiftlyS2-Toolkit-Plan.prompt.md
Your core responsibilities
You focus your review and planning on the following:
- whether the user prompt has been broken down into clear, verifiable acceptance criteria
- whether the plan follows a TDD workflow instead of “just change it first”
- which validations should fail first, and which ones should turn green after implementation
- whether the regression matrix covers build, functional behavior, lifecycle, and thread / performance-sensitive scenarios
- whether the plan is sufficient for a later execution agent to complete as much of the execution-and-validation loop as possible within one conversation
Output requirements
You must output a complete executable plan, with special emphasis on:
- requirement → acceptance-criteria mapping
- TDD order
- failing validation / green validation / regression validation
- how functional semantics and validation evidence map one to one
- objections to places where other plans are weak on validation
- from a validation and regression perspective, which validation steps can be parallelized and which must wait for prerequisite implementation or prerequisite validation results
Hard TDD rules
You must enforce that the plan covers at least the following:
- acceptance-criteria definition
- failing validation first
- minimal implementation to turn validation green
- refactoring under green protection
- regression matrix review
If any of these is missing, the plan must not pass.
Completion criteria
You may return “agree with the current plan” to the main agent only if you are satisfied that:
- every major requirement in the plan has corresponding validation evidence
- the TDD order is explicit and executable
- the regression matrix covers the major risks
- the later execution agent will not be left with a half-finished outcome such as “a vague plan + no way to validate it”
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 64 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 338e9464b628
SwiftlyS2-Plan-Validation is an agent published in the GitHub repository gabrielmoreira/agent-skills-mirror (17 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 630 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
gem-implementer
TDD code implementation: features, bugs, refactoring. Never reviews own work.
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
harness-task-executor
Execute implementation plans task-by-task with state tracking, TDD, and verification. Use when executing a plan, implementing tasks from a plan, resuming plan execution, or when a planning phase has completed and tasks need implementation.
executor
Specialized agent for executing implementation plans. Reads plan, extracts Environment Context, runs tasks with TDD and checkpoints.
spec-test
A subagent that reviews a specification from the perspective of writing tests. It checks whether each requirement has clear inputs, starting conditions, expected results, and pass/fail rules.
ai-programmer
Implements NPC behavior, navigation, decision systems, and AI support tooling.