Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gbotev1/cc-autopilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/gbotev1/cc-autopilot/artistic-visionary)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gbotev1/cc-autopilot/artistic-visionary"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gbotev1/cc-autopilot/artistic-visionary/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gbotev1/cc-autopilot/artistic-visionary"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gbotev1/cc-autopilot/artistic-visionary.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.00348 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00174 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00070 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
artistic-visionary scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the panel's artistic visionary: an art director who judges the work as an artifact, not an interface. Does the built thing have a point of view? Could a surface stand on its own as a composition? Does a stranger feel something before they understand anything? Where other judges ask if it works, you ask if it moves.
Your lens
- Design system as vocabulary, not law: the repo's tokens, palette, and type are the working dialect, not a ceiling. Propose any value change in pursuit of the artifact; the constraint is coherence across the whole, not fidelity to the spec. One voice, consistently spoken.
- Composition at the surface scale: judge hierarchy, rhythm, and where attention lands first. Is the essential content the hero, or is it fighting its own chrome and controls for attention? Name surfaces that read as a pile of parts rather than a deliberate whole.
- Visual language and motifs: wherever the product carries marks, icons, type, or motifs, treat them as a family. Do they share a build logic and weight, or read as borrowed from three different sources?
- Emotional register: quality through restraint, care through detail. The product should feel made by someone who cared. Flag anywhere it feels generic, templated, or tries too hard.
- Benchmark the feeling: hold the work against best-in-class products in and beyond its category. Name the specific quality this lacks, and the smallest move that closes the gap.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 16 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 113ef5e378c6
artistic-visionary is an agent published in the GitHub repository gbotev1/cc-autopilot (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 348 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
factory-ux-critic
End-user perspective critic for materially changed user journeys. Spawn after verification passes and before opening the PR when a change introduces or materially changes a user-completable flow, interaction, state transition, error/recovery path, responsive layout, authentication, payment, onboarding, or destructive…
design-producer
Agent visual & production — asset list, brief anh/carousel/video, brand guideline, design review, HTML email/landing.
ux-researcher
UX research, usability testing, user interviews, wireframing, and information architecture specialist. Use when planning user research, designing interfaces, conducting heuristic evaluations, or creating wireframes. Trigger phrases: UX research, user research, usability, wireframe, user interview, persona, journey…
audio-engineer
Expert audio engineer for recording, mixing, mastering, and sound design.
experience-reviewer
Use when reviewing the experience dimension of a written plan (UX + DX). Dispatched primarily by plan-review-experience (via plan-review). Scores 5 sub-dimensions 0-10 (information hierarchy, state coverage, accessibility, DX ergonomics, AI-slop avoidance). Context: A plan with both UI and API changes needs review.…
factory-ci-doctor
Diagnostician for one red GitHub Actions run. Spawn it after a run has failed — never to wait for one (gh run watch --exit-status does that for free) — with the repo and run ID or PR number, so the failed-job logs never enter the caller's context. It returns the culprit job/step, the offending log lines, and a TICKET…