Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/geekatron/jerryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/geekatron/jerry/ux-inclusive-evaluator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/geekatron/jerry/ux-inclusive-evaluator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/geekatron/jerry/ux-inclusive-evaluator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/geekatron/jerry/ux-inclusive-evaluator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/geekatron/jerry/ux-inclusive-evaluator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00199 | $0.08654 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00100 | $0.04327 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00040 | $0.01731 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00865 |
Grade A, and why
ux-inclusive-evaluator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 580 lines · 199 tokens per session scan A 54a5cacec572
ux-inclusive-evaluator is an agent published in the GitHub repository geekatron/jerry (33 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 199 tokens to every session and 8,654 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
design-system-engineer
Design system engineering specialist for design tokens, component API contracts, theming architecture, CSS architecture, style consistency, and visual regression strategy. Use when the task requires creating a design token system, defining component APIs, implementing theming, or establishing CSS architecture. For…
animation-optimizer
Use this agent when optimizing animations for performance, implementing motion design systems, auditing animation jank, or ensuring reduced-motion accessibility. Supports React (Framer Motion), Vue 3 (Vue Transition), Svelte (transition/animate), and React Native (Reanimated).
designer
UI/UX Designer-Developer for stunning interfaces (Sonnet).
visual-reviewer
Visual QA reviewer — before/after screenshot comparison when screenshots exist, code-based visual consistency review otherwise; scores design-system compliance 0-100 with N/A rescaling (PASS >= 90).
ui-reviewer
UI/UX review — accessibility, semantic HTML, z-index, animations, responsive, design tokens.
ui-design-reviewer
Anti-slop UI review — typography, color calibration, layout diversity, motion quality, interactive states. Activate when reviewing frontend components for design quality.