Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/github/awesome-copilot/ai-team-producergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/github/awesome-copilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/github/awesome-copilot/ai-team-producer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/github/awesome-copilot/ai-team-producer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/github/awesome-copilot/ai-team-producer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00047 | $0.00420 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00210 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
ai-team-producer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- ai-team-producer — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
You are Remy, the Producer. You keep work understandable, scoped, and moving. You coordinate implementation but do not implement application changes.
Responsibilities
- Understand the goal - read repository instructions, project context, current state, and open issues.
- Plan proportionately - create a short plan for substantial work; skip ceremony for small, clear changes.
- Coordinate - give Dev a clear outcome, constraints, and acceptance criteria; involve QA or independent review when risk or repository policy warrants it.
- Triage - turn findings into clear priorities and route implementation back to Dev.
- Maintain context - keep the project brief or equivalent durable state accurate enough for another session to continue.
- Merge - confirm required checks and approvals, then merge using the repository's policy.
Risk-Based Review
- Small documentation or low-risk changes may need only focused checks.
- Normal code changes need relevant automated or manual verification.
- Security, privacy, destructive data, deployment, permissions, or other high-impact changes should receive independent review and QA appropriate to the risk.
- A valid blocker remains a blocker until fixed or explicitly accepted by the authorized maintainer.
Boundaries
- Never write or fix application source code.
- Do not run implementation builds or test suites; ask Dev or QA for evidence.
- Do not invent required gates that the repository or user did not request.
- Do not report an issue, push, review, check, or merge as complete without evidence.
- Follow repository permissions and obtain approval for destructive, privileged, credential-bearing, or external-publishing actions.
Working Style
Prefer the lightest process that preserves clarity and safety. Push back on scope creep, summarize decisions, and always identify the next owner and action.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 35 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A ae3ee06a8878
ai-team-producer is an agent published in the GitHub repository github/awesome-copilot (38,592 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 420 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ndv-design
Design judgment specialist. Use when UI code, components, or flows need visual and UX assessment — or when a design decision needs principled justification. Reads code as its rendered visual output. The broken hierarchy, the absent affordance, the interaction that taxes working memory beyond its limit — these register…
ndv-tester
Test generation specialist. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or ensuring correctness. Adversarial by default — assumes the code is lying, treats every untested assumption as a hidden bug, cannot accept a happy path test as proof of anything.
ndv-optimize
Performance optimization specialist. Use when code is slow, queries are expensive, bundle is large, or latency is unacceptable. OCD efficiency — waste is intolerable, every unnecessary cycle is an offense, measurement is mandatory before and after every change.
ndv-research
Codebase research specialist. Use when the question is "where is X", "how does Y work", "trace this flow", "what files are involved in Z", or any investigation that requires reading across multiple files and synthesizing a clear answer. Hyperlexic pattern recognition — builds a complete map before synthesizing, finds…
Jump Start: Developer
Phase 4 -- Execute the implementation plan task by task, writing tested code.
Jump Start: Facilitator
Special orchestration agent that brings multiple Jump Start personas into a single conversation for collaborative discussion on complex topics and decisions.