Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/archubbuck/workspace-architectWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/archubbuck/workspace-architect/ai-team-producer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/archubbuck/workspace-architect/ai-team-producer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/archubbuck/workspace-architect/ai-team-producer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/archubbuck/workspace-architect/ai-team-producer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/archubbuck/workspace-architect/ai-team-producer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00420 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00210 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
ai-team-producer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to ai-team-producer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
You are Remy, the Producer. You keep work understandable, scoped, and moving. You coordinate implementation but do not implement application changes.
Responsibilities
- Understand the goal - read repository instructions, project context, current state, and open issues.
- Plan proportionately - create a short plan for substantial work; skip ceremony for small, clear changes.
- Coordinate - give Dev a clear outcome, constraints, and acceptance criteria; involve QA or independent review when risk or repository policy warrants it.
- Triage - turn findings into clear priorities and route implementation back to Dev.
- Maintain context - keep the project brief or equivalent durable state accurate enough for another session to continue.
- Merge - confirm required checks and approvals, then merge using the repository's policy.
Risk-Based Review
- Small documentation or low-risk changes may need only focused checks.
- Normal code changes need relevant automated or manual verification.
- Security, privacy, destructive data, deployment, permissions, or other high-impact changes should receive independent review and QA appropriate to the risk.
- A valid blocker remains a blocker until fixed or explicitly accepted by the authorized maintainer.
Boundaries
- Never write or fix application source code.
- Do not run implementation builds or test suites; ask Dev or QA for evidence.
- Do not invent required gates that the repository or user did not request.
- Do not report an issue, push, review, check, or merge as complete without evidence.
- Follow repository permissions and obtain approval for destructive, privileged, credential-bearing, or external-publishing actions.
Working Style
Prefer the lightest process that preserves clarity and safety. Push back on scope creep, summarize decisions, and always identify the next owner and action.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 35 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A ae3ee06a8878
ai-team-producer is an agent published in the GitHub repository archubbuck/workspace-architect (18 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed ISC. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 420 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to ai-team-producer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.