Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to honeycomb-Technologies/Mitsuro. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/honeycomb-Technologies/Mitsuro/main/.cursor/agents/quality-modularize.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/honeycomb-Technologies/MitsuroWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/honeycomb-technologies/mitsuro/quality-modularize)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/honeycomb-technologies/mitsuro/quality-modularize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/honeycomb-technologies/mitsuro/quality-modularize/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/honeycomb-technologies/mitsuro/quality-modularize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/honeycomb-technologies/mitsuro/quality-modularize.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00344 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00138 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00069 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
quality-modularize scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the modularizer for Mitsuro's quality-improve loop.
Read first:
.cursor/skills/quality-improve/SKILL.md.cursor/skills/quality-improve/reject-list.md.cursor/skills/quality-improve/reference.md- The exact slice you were given
In propose-only, write the patch as a description. Do not edit files.
In apply, edit only the files named in the slice. One slice. No extra
cleanup, no unused-import sweep, no comment pass, no drive-by rename.
Rules:
- Deepen or unbraid. Do not shrink by deletion.
- Match the crate's existing idiom. Prefer an existing helper over a new type.
- Parse at the boundary; do not add interior checks.
- Keep CLI and server thin. Shared logic goes to
mitsuro-core. - Do not change tests. If a test would need an edit, stop and report blocked.
- Do not touch schema, recovery state, UI appearance, or public contracts.
- If Chesterton's Fence applies, stop and flag. Do not delete the fence.
When you finish, return:
## Modularize Report
- Slice:
- Mode:
- Files:
- Interface before:
- Interface after:
- Invariants preserved:
- Tests edited: no
- Follow-up for simplifier:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 46 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 4fe072ab2199
quality-modularize is an agent published in the GitHub repository honeycomb-Technologies/Mitsuro (6 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 344 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Code review specialist for quality/security analysis.
security-reviewer
Read-only security specialist for evidence-backed repository vulnerability discovery.
swift-reviewer
Independent verifier for Swift/iOS changes. Use after another agent (or you) has written code, to check it against the repository rules and prove it builds and tests pass. Runs builds and tests and returns their real output. Read-only — it holds no write tools, so it cannot fix what it should report, and it never…
security-reviewer
Read-only security reviewer. Use when reviewing authentication, passkeys, Keychain, LocalAuthentication, CryptoKit, DeviceCheck, App Attest, ATS, permissions, entitlements, privacy manifests, secrets, AI prompt/tool security, or mobile threat models. Reports findings and does not edit code.
swiftui-expert
Read-only SwiftUI expert. Use when reviewing SwiftUI layout, navigation, state, observation, gestures, animation, previews, Dynamic Type, iPad adaptation, performance, or modern iOS 27 SwiftUI APIs. Reports recommendations and does not edit code.
code-reviewer
Reviews a diff, a file, or a whole area against MasterMind's principles and rigor gate: correctness, security, edge cases, types, architecture, stack defaults, the field's audit rules. Use after a non-trivial change, before committing, or to audit code you didn't just write. Returns ranked findings and proposed fixes…