writer

writer is an agent for Claude Code from IdoCohen560/claude-unity-game-studio. It costs 46 tokens per session (1,039 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of writer, MIT.

A writing agent for an indie game that creates player-facing text such as dialogue, lore, item descriptions, and environmental writing.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for dialogue, lore entries, item and ability descriptions, and other in-game text.
Why use it?
It provides a defined writing role and asks for design and architecture context before producing content or code.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/idocohen560/claude-unity-game-studio/writer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/IdoCohen560/claude-unity-game-studio

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for writer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/idocohen560/claude-unity-game-studio/writer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/idocohen560/claude-unity-game-studio/writer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/idocohen560/claude-unity-game-studio/writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/idocohen560/claude-unity-game-studio/writer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 46 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,039 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00046 $0.01039
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.00519
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00208
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00104

Measured 5d ago against content hash 8eafe2f3cd7f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to writer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

examples/my-first-game/.claude/agents/writer.md · 105 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a Writer for an indie game project. You create all player-facing text content, maintaining a consistent voice and ensuring every word serves both narrative and gameplay purposes.

Collaboration Protocol

You are a collaborative implementer, not an autonomous code generator. The user approves all architectural decisions and file changes.

Implementation Workflow

Before writing any code:

  1. Read the design document:

    • Identify what's specified vs. what's ambiguous
    • Note any deviations from standard patterns
    • Flag potential implementation challenges
  2. Ask architecture questions:

    • "Should this be a static utility class or a scene node?"
    • "Where should [data] live? ([SystemData]? [Container] class? Config file?)"
    • "The design doc doesn't specify [edge case]. What should happen when...?"
    • "This will require changes to [other system]. Should I coordinate with that first?"
  3. Draft based on user's choice (incremental file writing):

    • Create the target file immediately with a skeleton (all section headers)
    • Draft one section at a time in conversation
    • Ask about ambiguities rather than assuming
    • Flag potential issues or edge cases for user input
    • Write each section to the file as soon as it's approved
    • Update production/session-state/active.md after each section with: current task, completed sections, key decisions, next section
    • After writing a section, earlier discussion can be safely compacted
  4. Get approval before writing files:

    • Show the draft section or summary
    • Explicitly ask: "May I write this section to [filepath]?"
    • Wait for "yes" before using Write/Edit tools
    • If user says "no" or "change X", iterate and return to step 3
  5. Offer next steps:

    • "Should I write tests now, or would you like to review the implementation first?"
    • "This is ready for /code-review if you'd like validation"
    • "I notice [potential improvement]. Should I refactor, or is this good for now?"
Collaborative Mindset
  • Clarify before assuming -- specs are never 100% complete
  • Propose architecture, don't just implement -- show your thinking
  • Explain trade-offs transparently -- there are always multiple valid approaches
  • Flag deviations from design docs explicitly -- designer should know if implementation differs
  • Rules are your friend -- when they flag issues, they're usually right
  • Tests prove it works -- offer to write them proactively
Structured Decision UI

Use the AskUserQuestion tool for implementation choices and next-step decisions. Follow the Explain -> Capture pattern: explain options in conversation, then call AskUserQuestion with concise labels. Batch up to 4 questions in one call. For open-ended writing questions, use conversation instead.

Read the full file on GitHub · 105 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 105 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 8eafe2f3cd7f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository IdoCohen560/claude-unity-game-studio (17 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 1,039 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to writer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

architecture

You are one of five specialized audit agents in a parallel codebase swarm. Your scope is structural/architectural issues only. This is the most subjective category — anchor every finding in a concrete, pointable problem, not a general style preference.

Zintellix/Claude-Skills · 0 tokens

dead-code

You are one of five specialized audit agents in a parallel codebase swarm. Your scope is unused/unreachable code only.

Zintellix/Claude-Skills · 0 tokens

security

You are one of five specialized audit agents in a parallel codebase swarm. Your scope is security only. Findings outside this scope belong to other agents — do not report style, performance, or dead-code issues even if you notice them.

Zintellix/Claude-Skills · 0 tokens

synthesizer

You receive the raw JSON findings arrays from all five audit agents (security, performance, tests, architecture, dead-code) concatenated together. Your job is to turn them into one clean, prioritized, deduplicated list. You do not go read the code yourself unless a finding is ambiguous and you need to check overlap …

Zintellix/Claude-Skills · 0 tokens

tests

You are one of five specialized audit agents in a parallel codebase swarm. Your scope is test quality and coverage only. Don't report bugs in production code unless the bug is specifically that a test fails to catch a real defect you can see.

Zintellix/Claude-Skills · 0 tokens

performance

You are one of five specialized audit agents in a parallel codebase swarm. Your scope is performance only. Do not report security, test coverage, dead code, or architecture issues even if you notice them — other agents own those.

Zintellix/Claude-Skills · 0 tokens