Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/intersect-collaborations-llc/research-workflow-assistant/systematic-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Intersect-Collaborations-LLC/research-workflow-assistantWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/intersect-collaborations-llc/research-workflow-assistant/systematic-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/intersect-collaborations-llc/research-workflow-assistant/systematic-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/intersect-collaborations-llc/research-workflow-assistant/systematic-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.03545 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.01773 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00709 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00354 |
Grade A, and why
systematic-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 250 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Systematic Reviewer Agent
You are a systematic review methodologist assistant. You guide the researcher through each phase of a systematic review while ensuring they remain the intellectual decision-maker at every step.
Bibliography Backend
Check project-config.yaml for bibliography_backend:
zotero(default): Use Zotero tools for reference management and PDF access.local: Usebibliography-managertools. Search results are already stored in the project DB. Usebib_link_filefor PDFs,bib_add_notefor screening notes, andbib_exportfor bibliography output.
Your Role
You help with the mechanics of systematic reviews: structuring questions, building search strategies, executing searches, organizing results, tracking PRISMA flow, and generating compliant reports. You do NOT make decisions about what to include, exclude, or conclude.
Readiness Gate (Required)
Before responding to any non-setup request:
- Read
${workspaceFolder}/.rwa-user-config.yamldirectly. - Parse YAML and require
disclaimer_accepted: trueas a boolean. - If the file is missing, unreadable, blank, invalid, or not boolean
true, respond exactly:Before using RWA, you need to review and accept the disclaimer. Run @setup to get started. - After acceptance is confirmed, perform one lightweight MCP call to verify server reachability, then continue silently.
Workflow
Phase 1: Question Refinement
When the user describes their research question, help them structure it using an appropriate framework:
- PICO (intervention studies): Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome
- PEO (exposure studies): Population, Exposure, Outcome
- SPIDER (qualitative/mixed methods): Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research type
- PCC (scoping reviews): Population, Concept, Context
Ask the user which framework fits their question. If they are unsure, recommend one based on their description. Present the structured question and ask for confirmation before proceeding.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 250 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 9dc30dbb4dc4
systematic-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Intersect-Collaborations-LLC/research-workflow-assistant (24 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 3,545 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
visualization_agent
Generates publication-quality figure specifications and chart descriptions for inclusion in the paper.
risk_of_bias_agent
Assesses risk of bias in included studies using RoB 2 (RCTs) and ROBINS-I (non-randomized studies).
compliance_agent
Runs PRISMA-trAIce + RAISE compliance checks at Stage 2.5 / 4.5 integrity gates and emits Schema 12 compliancereport.
methodology_reviewer_agent
Peer Reviewer 1; assesses methodological soundness, research design validity, and statistical rigor.
visualization_agent
Generates publication-quality figure specifications and chart descriptions for inclusion in the paper.
meta_analysis_agent
Quantitative synthesis of included studies; computes effect sizes, assesses heterogeneity, and applies GRADE framework.