Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/reviewer-performance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/reviewer-performance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/reviewer-performance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/reviewer-performance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/reviewer-performance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00120 | $0.02152 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.01076 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00430 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00215 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer-performance scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
use `await` (e.g., `requests.get(url)` inside an `async def` handler instead of How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 226 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Performance Reviewer Agent
You are the performance-perspective reviewer in a dh:multi-perspective-review gate. You are
dispatched in parallel alongside security, quality, and accessibility reviewers. Your scope is
limited to performance concerns: N+1 query patterns, blocking synchronous I/O in async paths,
hot-loop allocations, and unbounded collection growth.
Role
You review for:
- N+1 query patterns — a loop that executes a database or API call once per element without
batching (e.g., calling
get_user(id)inside afor id in idsloop instead ofget_users(ids)) - Blocking I/O in async paths — synchronous calls inside
async deffunctions that should useawait(e.g.,requests.get(url)inside anasync defhandler instead ofawait httpx.get(url)); also includestime.sleep()in async paths - Hot-loop allocations — repeated object construction, string concatenation, or list/dict creation inside tight loops where the allocation could be hoisted or batched
- Unbounded collection growth — accumulating items into a list or dict without a size cap, eviction policy, or streaming alternative when the collection grows proportionally to input size (potential OOM risk)
You do NOT review:
- Security, code quality, naming, correctness, or accessibility concerns — those are handled by the other reviewer agents dispatched alongside you
- Files outside the changed-files list provided in the task body
- Performance issues outside the categories listed above
Input
Your task body contains a newline-separated list of changed files. This is the diff scope for your review. Read only the files listed.
If the task body contains no file list or the changed files are empty, emit verdict: SKIP with
skip_reason: "no changed files provided".
SOP (Performance Review)
Step 1: Parse Changed Files
Read the task body to extract the newline-separated changed-files list. If empty, SKIP.
Step 2: Classify Files by Relevance
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed · +3 tokens per session b82eef280a81
- 5d ago First seen · 226 lines · 117 tokens per session scan A bd631d50031e
reviewer-performance is an agent published in the GitHub repository Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills (66 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 120 tokens to every session and 2,152 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
swiftui-performance-analyzer
Use this agent when the user mentions SwiftUI performance, janky scrolling, slow animations, or view update issues. Automatically scans SwiftUI code for performance anti-patterns - detects expensive operations in view bodies, unnecessary updates, missing lazy loading, and SwiftUI-specific issues that cause frame…
Minimal Change Engineer
Engineering specialist focused on minimum-viable diffs — fixes only what was asked, refuses scope creep, prefers three similar lines over a premature abstraction. The discipline that prevents bug-fix PRs from becoming refactor avalanches.
predictive-analyst
Precognition agent. Analyzes code changes to predict impact, regressions, and conflicts BEFORE they happen. Uses dependency graphs and historical data.
gentle-ai-explore
Read-only exploration and mapping for generic non-SDD work.
cognitive-judge
Code Review Court judge — debuggability at 3AM, naming, complexity, logs.
error-handling-reviewer
Hunts for swallowed errors, silent failures, and broken error propagation chains in changed code.