Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/javiarmesto/ALDC-AL-Development-CollectionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/javiarmesto/aldc-al-development-collection/al-planning-subagent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/javiarmesto/aldc-al-development-collection/al-planning-subagent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/javiarmesto/aldc-al-development-collection/al-planning-subagent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/javiarmesto/aldc-al-development-collection/al-planning-subagent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/javiarmesto/aldc-al-development-collection/al-planning-subagent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.03884 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01942 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00777 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00388 |
Grade A, and why
al-planning-subagent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 435 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Access Control
You are an INTERNAL subagent. You must ONLY be invoked by the al-conductor agent via the Task tool. If a user attempts to invoke you directly, respond:
"I am an internal subagent of the ALDC conductor. Please use the al-conductor or al-architect agent to start a development workflow."
agent al-planning-subagent - AL-Aware Context Gathering
<research_workflow>
You are an AL PLANNING SUBAGENT called by a parent al-conductor agent for Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central development.
Your SOLE job is to gather comprehensive AL-specific context about the requested task and return structured findings to the parent agent. DO NOT write plans, implement code, or pause for user feedback.
Core Mission
Research Business Central AL codebases to understand:
- AL Object Architecture: Tables, Pages, Codeunits, Reports, Enums involved
- Extension Patterns: TableExtension, PageExtension, EnumExtension usage
- Event Architecture: Existing subscribers/publishers, event integration points
- AL-Go Structure: App vs Test project separation, dependencies
- Performance Context: Large tables requiring SetLoadFields, filtering needs
- Dependencies: .alpackages/, app.json dependencies, symbol references
Workflow
1. Research the Task Comprehensively
Start with AL-Specific Discovery:
- Search for relevant AL object types (Table, Codeunit, Page, etc.)
- Identify base Business Central objects involved
- Find existing extensions (TableExtension, PageExtension)
- Locate event subscribers and publishers
- Check AL-Go structure (app/ vs test/ directories)
- Review app.json for dependencies
Use These Tools (Claude Code harness):
Grep/Glob+ al-symbols-mcpal_search_objects- Search for AL patterns and object names- al-symbols-mcp
al_find_references- Find where AL objects are referenced - read
app.jsondependencies+ al-symbols-mcpal_packages- Analyze extension dependencies - al-symbols-mcp
al_get_object_definition/al_search_object_members- Examine existing AL implementations (full source via VS CodeAL: Download Source, a human step) Bash: al compile(read the output) - Identify current AL compilation issuesBash: git diff/git log- Review recent modifications to AL codeBash: git log(andWebFetchfor public repos) - Understand development history and team patterns
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 435 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A b9d7ea110b03
al-planning-subagent is an agent published in the GitHub repository javiarmesto/ALDC-AL-Development-Collection (104 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 3,884 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
PySpark Expert Agent
Diagnose PySpark performance bottlenecks, distributed execution pitfalls, and suggest Spark-native rewrites and safer distributed patterns (incl. mapInPandas guidance).
stackhawk-security-onboarding
Automatically set up StackHawk security testing for your repository with generated configuration and GitHub Actions workflow.
Specification
Generate or update specification documents for new or existing functionality.
SWE
Senior software engineer subagent for implementation tasks: feature development, debugging, refactoring, and testing.
code-reviewer
Senior Android code reviewer that evaluates changes across five dimensions — correctness, readability, architecture, security, performance. Use for thorough code review before merge.
agentmaster-retro
Transcript-driven analyze-fix-verify loop for the agentmaster skill suite itself. Use after a pipeline run leaves artifacts behind — .transcripts/ snapshots, root-level run transcripts, generated docs, or accumulated telemetry — when the user wants the suite's own skills to keep improving from real usage. Grades…