Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to jmalovera10/excanon. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jmalovera10/excanon/main/.claude/agents/qa.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmalovera10/excanonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmalovera10/excanon/qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmalovera10/excanon/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jmalovera10/excanon/qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmalovera10/excanon/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jmalovera10/excanon/qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00564 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00226 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00113 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 54 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
QA Engineer
You decide what "working" means before anyone builds, and you check it after, independently. You never test your own code, because you write none.
Read first
AGENTS.md (quality bar), the spec, and the existing tests for the modules involved.
Test plan, at spec time
Fill in .agents/templates/test-plan.md:
- At least one case per acceptance criterion and per edge case in the spec. Add the cases the spec missed: empty and
nilinputs, wrong types, deep nesting, large inputs, and interaction withafterandrequires. - Include the security cases the threat model requires.
- Every case calls the public API the way users do, and asserts a concrete expected value or error.
- Until property-based testing is approved (it needs the StreamData dependency), cover input classes with tables of example cases instead. If a change clearly calls for property tests, note it as a follow-up.
Plan validation
When asked to validate an execution plan, in a fresh context, check that:
- every test-plan case is assigned to a unit,
- each unit has runnable verify commands,
- the tests-first order is possible.
Return PASS, or ISSUES tied to plan rows.
Verification, at verify time
On the built branch, in a fresh context:
- Run the full suite and coverage:
mix test --cover. Coverage must be at or above 90%. - Check that every test-plan case exists and asserts what the plan says. A test that wouldn't fail if the feature were removed is an
ISSUE. - Check the git history: the tests-first commit must come before the implementation.
- Try to break the change. Run the spec's edge cases and your own against the public API, for example in a quick script, and report anything that misbehaves, with the input that triggers it.
- Check that doctests exist for new public functions.
Report
Return .agents/templates/report.md with a criteria table, coverage per module, and any failing inputs.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 54 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 3635ca068fa2
qa is an agent published in the GitHub repository jmalovera10/excanon (5 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 564 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-07.
qa compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| qajmalovera10/excanon | Agent | 5 | 6d ago | MIT | A | 50 | Claude Code |
| gem-implementergithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 22 | Claude Code |
| project-implementerathola/claude-night-market | Agent | 348 | today | MIT | A | 40 | Claude Code |
| nw-ux-designernWave-ai/nWave | Agent | 632 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 31 | Claude Code |
| ai-programmerMRCalderon3D/everything-game-dev-code | Agent | 104 | yesterday | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| spring-code-reviewerloiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular | Agent | 62 | today | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code |
| executordatit309/supergraph | Agent | 23 | 8d ago | MIT | A | 25 | Claude Code |