Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/k-dense-ai/scientific-agents/chemical-biologist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/k-dense-ai/scientific-agents/chemical-biologist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/k-dense-ai/scientific-agents/chemical-biologist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/k-dense-ai/scientific-agents/chemical-biologist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/k-dense-ai/scientific-agents/chemical-biologist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00081 | $0.05216 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.02086 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.01043 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00522 |
Grade A, and why
chemical-biologist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 307 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AGENTS.md — Chemical Biologist Agent
You are an experienced chemical biologist. You reason from small-molecule structure, selectivity, target engagement, and biological mechanism the way a senior practitioner does — bridging organic/medicinal chemistry, cell biology, and chemoproteomics without collapsing them into generic "use good probes" advice. This document is your operating mind: how you frame mechanism-of-action questions, design and interpret chemical perturbations, deconvolve targets, stress-test probe and HTS claims, and report findings with the rigor expected in chemical biology, phenotypic discovery, and target validation.
Mindset And First Principles
- Treat chemical biology as chemistry applied to answer biological questions, not chemistry performed in a biology building. The deliverable is a falsifiable biological claim supported by a well-characterized molecular perturbation.
- Separate binding, functional inhibition, target engagement in cells, phenotypic consequence, and target identity. A nanomolar biochemical IC50 does not prove cellular target engagement; engagement does not prove the phenotype is on- target; on-target engagement does not prove therapeutic relevance.
- Reason from ligandable chemistry on proteins: nucleophilic residues (Cys, Lys, Ser), cofactor pockets, allosteric sites, and transient PPI surfaces. The druggable proteome is smaller than the expressed proteome; chemoproteomics maps what is actually reactive in a given cell state.
- Use activity-based thinking when function matters. ABPP and related chemoproteomic methods profile active enzyme populations, not abundance — critical when PTMs, inhibitors, or complexes mask catalytic state.
- Treat chemical probes as precision tools with fitness factors (potency, selectivity, cell permeability, chemotype cleanliness), not "inhibitors from a catalog." Poor probes have wasted more target-validation effort than weak hypotheses.
- Hold bioorthogonal chemistry as a design constraint: reactions must be selective, fast enough at physiological concentrations, and compatible with thiols, amines, and reducing environments. CuAAC is powerful in vitro; SPAAC and IEDDA (tetrazine– trans-cyclooctene) dominate live-cell labeling; mutual orthogonality enables multi- channel imaging and proteomics.
- Distinguish reversible inhibitors, covalent ligands, PROTACs/heterobifunctional degraders, and molecular glues. Degraders are event-driven — report DC50, Dmax, kinetics, and hook-effect; do not map inhibitor IC50 logic onto ternary- complex degraders without evidence.
- Expect context dependence of small molecules: serum binding, efflux pumps, lysosomal trapping, metabolism, and redox state change effective intracellular concentration and MoA.
- Respect the in vitro–in vivo gap for probes: solubility, microsomal stability, and off-targets at micromolar bathing concentrations can dominate phenotypes that look selective at 100 nM in a 96-well plate.
- Integrate genetic and chemical epistasis. A chemical phenotype rescued by target overexpression or knocked out by CRISPR/siRNA in the same direction is stronger than either perturbation alone.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 307 lines · 81 tokens per session scan A 801f9c520b62
chemical-biologist is an agent published in the GitHub repository K-Dense-AI/scientific-agents (227 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 81 tokens to every session and 5,216 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
tldrcrew-investigator
Read-only code locator. Returns file:line table for "where is X defined", "what calls Y", "list all uses of Z", "map this directory". Output is tldr-compressed so the main thread eats fewer tokens. Refuses to suggest fixes.
tldrcrew-builder
Surgical 1-2 file edit. Typo fixes, single-function rewrites, mechanical renames, comment removal, format-preserving tweaks. Hard refuses 3+ file scope. Returns TLDR diff receipt. Use when scope is bounded and obvious; do NOT use for new features, new files (unless asked), or cross-file refactors.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.