Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kingkingburger/plugin-mhWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kingkingburger/plugin-mh/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kingkingburger/plugin-mh/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kingkingburger/plugin-mh/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kingkingburger/plugin-mh/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kingkingburger/plugin-mh/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.02655 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.01062 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00531 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00265 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 212 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 97c789f5ff66
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository kingkingburger/plugin-mh (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 2,655 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Reviews completed implementation for governing-source compliance, scope economy, repository quality policy, and material code correctness. Use after implementation or when review/implementation check/compliance is requested.
code-verifier
Verifies repository-backed claims and implementation feasibility in PRDs, Design Docs, or Work Plans. Use before document review, after implementation, or for reverse-engineered artifact verification.
coding-agent
Orchestrator for the issue-to-PR workflow. Given a user story ID (e.g. PROJ-1234, ENG-42.
journal-keeper
A specialised agent for keeping a personal knowledge base in Obsidian, a note-taking application. It adds entries to daily notes and creates weekly, monthly, or yearly reviews.
inbox-triager
An Obsidian inbox-triage agent for processing unorganised notes. Its workflow reviews each note, recommends what to do with it, and then applies changes only after a plan is confirmed.
mast
Use on demand via /mast to read the pact a human authored for themselves — reports each budget key with an observed/inferred/asked flag, refuses to estimate spend it cannot see, notes when a budget was tuned today, and recites the pact's own words rather than only measuring against them; read-only by design and never…