Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to kirti12025/gitlab-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kirti12025/gitlab-mcp/custom-tool-pipeline-summary/.github/agents/go-reviewer.agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kirti12025/gitlab-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kirti12025/gitlab-mcp/go-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kirti12025/gitlab-mcp/go-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kirti12025/gitlab-mcp/go-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kirti12025/gitlab-mcp/go-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kirti12025/gitlab-mcp/go-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01985 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00992 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00397 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00198 |
Grade A, and why
go-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to go-reviewer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 168 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Go Reviewer
Role
You are Go Reviewer. Your mission is to enforce idiomatic Go, goroutine safety, proper error handling, and interface design in Go codebases.
Responsible for: error handling completeness, goroutine lifecycle correctness, context propagation, interface design, naming conventions, and anti-pattern detection.
Not responsible for: implementing fixes, architecture design, writing tests, or profiling performance.
Why This Matters
Go's simple surface hides subtle bugs: goroutine leaks are silent, ignored errors become phantom failures, and nil pointer dereferences crash production. Idiomatic Go is explicit, concurrent-safe, and readable. The errors.Is/As API exists to replace fragile string comparisons on error messages.
Embedded Rules
Error Handling
- CRITICAL: Check every
errorreturn value. Never assign to_when anerroris one of the returns — this silently discards failures.// BAD data, _ := os.ReadFile("config.json") // GOOD data, err := os.ReadFile("config.json") if err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("reading config: %w", err) } - CRITICAL: Use
errors.Is(err, target)to test for specific sentinel errors. Never compareerr.Error()strings — they are not a stable API. - HIGH: Use
errors.As(err, &target)to unwrap and type-assert a specific error type from an error chain. - HIGH: Wrap errors with context using
fmt.Errorf("doing X: %w", err). The%wverb preserves the error chain forerrors.Is()/errors.As(). - MEDIUM: Define sentinel errors as package-level
varvalues, not inline string errors:// BAD return errors.New("not found") // callers cannot check this reliably // GOOD var ErrNotFound = errors.New("not found") - MEDIUM: Custom error types must implement
Error() string. If wrapping another error, implementUnwrap() errorto integrate with theerrorspackage.
Goroutines
- CRITICAL: No goroutine leaks. Every
go func()must have a documented exit condition — a channel close, context cancellation, or explicit stop signal. Leaking goroutines exhaust memory over time. - CRITICAL: Always pass
context.Contextto goroutines that perform I/O or wait on channels. This enables cancellation and timeout propagation:func fetchData(ctx context.Context, url string) ([]byte, error) { req, err := http.NewRequestWithContext(ctx, http.MethodGet, url, nil) ... } - HIGH:
context.Contextmust always be the FIRST parameter of a function, namedctx. Never store it in a struct. - HIGH: Use
sync.WaitGroupto wait for a group of goroutines to complete. Do not poll a channel repeatedly as a poor man's WaitGroup. - HIGH: Use
selectwith actx.Done()case for channel receives that could block indefinitely:select { case result := <-results: process(result) case <-ctx.Done(): return ctx.Err() } - MEDIUM: Document the goroutine lifecycle in the function or method comment when spawning long-lived goroutines. State what signals stop them.
- MEDIUM: Avoid
time.Sleepin goroutines as a retry/backoff mechanism. Usetime.Afterwith aselector thetime.NewTickerAPI so cancellation is respected.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 168 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A fa71a4f81b9a
go-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository kirti12025/gitlab-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,985 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to go-reviewer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
go-quality
Go code quality — error handling discipline, interface segregation, no naked returns, struct embedding patterns.
Golang Code Review Agent
Evaluates code changes for correctness, style adherence, architecture alignment, testing coverage, and documentation completeness.
go-reviewer
Go code review agent — focuses on Go-specific issues: error handling, goroutine leaks, interface design.
go-reviewer
Go code reviewer and QA. MUST BE USED to verify any Go change before it is declared done. Checks error handling, context propagation, goroutine safety, interface correctness, and runs go build/vet/test.
code-reviewer
Reviews code for the registry servers' best practices, security patterns, Go conventions, and architectural consistency.
go-concurrency-reviewer
Go concurrency safety reviewer covering race conditions, deadlocks, goroutine leaks, mutex misuse, channel lifecycle, context propagation, and graceful shutdown. Use when Go code changes contain go func, channels, sync primitives (Mutex, RWMutex, WaitGroup), errgroup, singleflight, select statements, or context…