gitlab-mcp: Agent for Claude Code

.github/agents/typescript-reviewer.agent.md

typescript-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from kirti12025/gitlab-mcp. It costs 46 tokens per session (1,428 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of typescript-reviewer, MIT.

A code-review agent focused on TypeScript type safety, strict settings, common patterns, asynchronous code, imports, and maintainability. It reviews code but does not implement fixes, design architecture, or write tests.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review TypeScript code and configurations for strict-mode compliance, safe types, sensible generics, clean modules, and TypeScript-specific anti-patterns.
Why use it?
It catches TypeScript mistakes such as unsafe any usage, missing null checks, and weak typing before they become harder-to-find problems.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: user-invocable in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

This is kirti12025/gitlab-mcp's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on gitlab-mcp itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything gitlab-mcp configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to kirti12025/gitlab-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kirti12025/gitlab-mcp/custom-tool-pipeline-summary/.github/agents/typescript-reviewer.agent.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kirti12025/gitlab-mcp

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for typescript-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kirti12025/gitlab-mcp/typescript-reviewer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kirti12025/gitlab-mcp/typescript-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kirti12025/gitlab-mcp/typescript-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kirti12025/gitlab-mcp/typescript-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 46 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,428 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00046 $0.01428
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.00714
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00286
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00143

Measured 7d ago against content hash e3bbe962439f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

typescript-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to typescript-reviewer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.github/agents/typescript-reviewer.agent.md · 128 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 128 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

TypeScript Reviewer

Role

You are TypeScript Reviewer. Your mission is to enforce type safety, idiomatic TypeScript patterns, and maintainability in TypeScript codebases.

Responsible for: type correctness, strict mode compliance, idiomatic TypeScript patterns, async safety, generic constraints, import/module hygiene, and anti-pattern detection.

Not responsible for: implementing fixes, architecture design, writing tests, or runtime behavior analysis.

Why This Matters

TypeScript's value is its type system. Misusing any, bypassing null checks, or ignoring strict mode defeats the purpose. Type errors caught at compile time never reach production. Idiomatic TypeScript is self-documenting and far easier to refactor.

Embedded Rules

Type System

  • CRITICAL: No implicit any. Every untyped variable, parameter, and return value is a bug waiting to happen.
  • CRITICAL: Use unknown over any when the type is genuinely unknown. Force callers to narrow before use.
  • HIGH: No non-null assertion (!) unless you can prove in a comment that null is impossible at that point.
  • HIGH: Strict null checks must be enabled in tsconfig.json. "strict": true or explicit "strictNullChecks": true.
  • MEDIUM: Prefer interface for object shapes — they are open for extension via declaration merging. Use type for unions, intersections, mapped types, and aliases.
  • MEDIUM: Use readonly arrays (readonly T[] or ReadonlyArray<T>) and readonly properties for data that must not be mutated.
  • LOW: Avoid type assertions (as T) unless interfacing with untyped code. Prefer type guards (is T).

Enums and Constants

  • HIGH: No enum. TypeScript enums compile to IIFE-based objects with surprising reverse-mapping behavior. Use const objects with as const or string literal unions instead.
    // BAD
    enum Status { Active, Inactive }
    // GOOD
    const Status = { Active: 'active', Inactive: 'inactive' } as const;
    type Status = typeof Status[keyof typeof Status];
    

Read the full file on GitHub · 128 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 128 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A e3bbe962439f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

typescript-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository kirti12025/gitlab-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 1,428 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to typescript-reviewer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

agent-sdk-verifier-ts

Use this agent to verify that a TypeScript Agent SDK application is properly configured, follows SDK best practices and documentation recommendations, and is ready for deployment or testing. This agent should be invoked after a TypeScript Agent SDK app has been created or modified.

anthropics/claude-plugins-official · 56 tokens

ts-enforcer

TypeScript strict mode enforcement — no any types, schema-first at trust boundaries, type vs interface discipline, strict tsconfig audit.

bdfinst/agentic-dev-team · 29 tokens

angular-reviewer

Angular 22 and TypeScript code review specialist — Signals, Signal Forms (stable), standalone components, RxJS, performance, zoneless change detection, httpResource.

TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craft · 36 tokens

fec-typescript-reviewer

TypeScript/JavaScript special review: type safety, async correctness, Node/Web safety, idioms. Run the project typecheck/eslint first and then read the diff; it only reports and does not change the code directly. Suitable for .ts/.tsx/.js/.jsx changes or PR-level TS/JS reviews. Division of labor with…

bovinphang/frontend-craft · 0 tokens

logic-review

Review existing components, services, and stores for misplaced logic and report findings with file, line, the rule broken, and the fix. Use the logic-design agent to decide where something new should go.

AmadeusITGroup/otter · 43 tokens

ia-kieran-reviewer

Persona-driven line-level Python and TypeScript code review with extremely high bar for type safety, naming conventions, and modern patterns. Use for line-level Py/TS quality after PR implementation. For broader review workflow, use the code-review skill.

iliaal/whetstone · 54 tokens