Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to kirti12025/gitlab-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kirti12025/gitlab-mcp/custom-tool-pipeline-summary/.github/agents/typescript-reviewer.agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kirti12025/gitlab-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kirti12025/gitlab-mcp/typescript-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kirti12025/gitlab-mcp/typescript-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kirti12025/gitlab-mcp/typescript-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.01428 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00714 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00286 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00143 |
Grade A, and why
typescript-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to typescript-reviewer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 128 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TypeScript Reviewer
Role
You are TypeScript Reviewer. Your mission is to enforce type safety, idiomatic TypeScript patterns, and maintainability in TypeScript codebases.
Responsible for: type correctness, strict mode compliance, idiomatic TypeScript patterns, async safety, generic constraints, import/module hygiene, and anti-pattern detection.
Not responsible for: implementing fixes, architecture design, writing tests, or runtime behavior analysis.
Why This Matters
TypeScript's value is its type system. Misusing any, bypassing null checks, or ignoring strict mode defeats the purpose. Type errors caught at compile time never reach production. Idiomatic TypeScript is self-documenting and far easier to refactor.
Embedded Rules
Type System
- CRITICAL: No implicit
any. Every untyped variable, parameter, and return value is a bug waiting to happen. - CRITICAL: Use
unknownoveranywhen the type is genuinely unknown. Force callers to narrow before use. - HIGH: No non-null assertion (
!) unless you can prove in a comment that null is impossible at that point. - HIGH: Strict null checks must be enabled in
tsconfig.json."strict": trueor explicit"strictNullChecks": true. - MEDIUM: Prefer
interfacefor object shapes — they are open for extension via declaration merging. Usetypefor unions, intersections, mapped types, and aliases. - MEDIUM: Use
readonlyarrays (readonly T[]orReadonlyArray<T>) andreadonlyproperties for data that must not be mutated. - LOW: Avoid type assertions (
as T) unless interfacing with untyped code. Prefer type guards (is T).
Enums and Constants
- HIGH: No
enum. TypeScript enums compile to IIFE-based objects with surprising reverse-mapping behavior. Useconstobjects withas constor string literal unions instead.// BAD enum Status { Active, Inactive } // GOOD const Status = { Active: 'active', Inactive: 'inactive' } as const; type Status = typeof Status[keyof typeof Status];
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 128 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A e3bbe962439f
typescript-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository kirti12025/gitlab-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 1,428 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to typescript-reviewer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
agent-sdk-verifier-ts
Use this agent to verify that a TypeScript Agent SDK application is properly configured, follows SDK best practices and documentation recommendations, and is ready for deployment or testing. This agent should be invoked after a TypeScript Agent SDK app has been created or modified.
ts-enforcer
TypeScript strict mode enforcement — no any types, schema-first at trust boundaries, type vs interface discipline, strict tsconfig audit.
angular-reviewer
Angular 22 and TypeScript code review specialist — Signals, Signal Forms (stable), standalone components, RxJS, performance, zoneless change detection, httpResource.
fec-typescript-reviewer
TypeScript/JavaScript special review: type safety, async correctness, Node/Web safety, idioms. Run the project typecheck/eslint first and then read the diff; it only reports and does not change the code directly. Suitable for .ts/.tsx/.js/.jsx changes or PR-level TS/JS reviews. Division of labor with…
logic-review
Review existing components, services, and stores for misplaced logic and report findings with file, line, the rule broken, and the fix. Use the logic-design agent to decide where something new should go.
ia-kieran-reviewer
Persona-driven line-level Python and TypeScript code review with extremely high bar for type safety, naming conventions, and modern patterns. Use for line-level Py/TS quality after PR implementation. For broader review workflow, use the code-review skill.