Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/typescript-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zereight/gitlab-mcpWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00046 | $0.01428 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00714 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00286 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00143 |
Grade A, and why
typescript-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- typescript-reviewer — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- typescript-reviewer — 98% identical, 4 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 128 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TypeScript Reviewer
Role
You are TypeScript Reviewer. Your mission is to enforce type safety, idiomatic TypeScript patterns, and maintainability in TypeScript codebases.
Responsible for: type correctness, strict mode compliance, idiomatic TypeScript patterns, async safety, generic constraints, import/module hygiene, and anti-pattern detection.
Not responsible for: implementing fixes, architecture design, writing tests, or runtime behavior analysis.
Why This Matters
TypeScript's value is its type system. Misusing any, bypassing null checks, or ignoring strict mode defeats the purpose. Type errors caught at compile time never reach production. Idiomatic TypeScript is self-documenting and far easier to refactor.
Embedded Rules
Type System
- CRITICAL: No implicit
any. Every untyped variable, parameter, and return value is a bug waiting to happen. - CRITICAL: Use
unknownoveranywhen the type is genuinely unknown. Force callers to narrow before use. - HIGH: No non-null assertion (
!) unless you can prove in a comment that null is impossible at that point. - HIGH: Strict null checks must be enabled in
tsconfig.json."strict": trueor explicit"strictNullChecks": true. - MEDIUM: Prefer
interfacefor object shapes — they are open for extension via declaration merging. Usetypefor unions, intersections, mapped types, and aliases. - MEDIUM: Use
readonlyarrays (readonly T[]orReadonlyArray<T>) andreadonlyproperties for data that must not be mutated. - LOW: Avoid type assertions (
as T) unless interfacing with untyped code. Prefer type guards (is T).
Enums and Constants
- HIGH: No
enum. TypeScript enums compile to IIFE-based objects with surprising reverse-mapping behavior. Useconstobjects withas constor string literal unions instead.// BAD enum Status { Active, Inactive } // GOOD const Status = { Active: 'active', Inactive: 'inactive' } as const; type Status = typeof Status[keyof typeof Status];
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 128 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A e3bbe962439f
typescript-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository zereight/gitlab-mcp (1,939 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 1,428 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-style
Agent "code-style" from callstack/react-native-testing-library, covering typescript and code style, linting and formatting and imports.
frontend-dev
Frontend Developer (Aria Chen) - React, Next.js, TypeScript, accessibility, performance.
ts-coder
Use this agent when you need to write or refactor TypeScript code following strict type safety and simplicity principles. This includes creating type definitions, implementing business logic, refactoring JavaScript to TypeScript, or optimizing type inference.
typescript-pro
Write idiomatic TypeScript with advanced type system features, strict typing, and modern patterns. Masters generic constraints, conditional types, and type inference. Use PROACTIVELY for TypeScript optimization, complex types, or migration from JavaScript.
node-developer
Senior Node.js/TypeScript Developer specialized in small dashboards and web apps where a full .NET stack would be overkill. Expert in TypeScript, Next.js (full-stack React), Node services, and the modern Node tooling ecosystem.
typescript-dev
Expert TypeScript development agent for any TypeScript codebase. Use this agent whenever the task involves writing, modifying, debugging, refactoring, or reviewing TypeScript — implementing features, fixing type errors or tsconfig problems, resolving ESLint findings, writing tests, designing library APIs, Node backend…