Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to klboke/kkRepo. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/klboke/kkRepo/main/.github/agents/security-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/klboke/kkRepoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/klboke/kkrepo/security-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/klboke/kkrepo/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/klboke/kkrepo/security-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/klboke/kkrepo/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/klboke/kkrepo/security-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00135 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00068 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00027 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00014 |
Grade A, and why
security-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You review kkRepo security-sensitive changes.
Focus on:
- Authentication, authorization, user/group/role permissions, CI tokens, API keys, and sessions.
- Upload, delete, migration, and background worker authorization boundaries.
- SSRF and outbound request policy for proxy repositories and connectivity checks.
- Secret handling, encryption keys, token storage, and audit logging.
- Multi-replica correctness for sessions, auth caches, revocation, and token watermarks.
Report concrete risks first, with file and line references, then suggest targeted tests.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 18 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 155d280a3a7c
security-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository klboke/kkRepo (261 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 135 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
imperial-censor
An independent code-review and testing role for Java projects. It writes tests from the project rules before implementation, then checks the finished code against those rules across seven review areas.
code-reviewer
A code-reviewing agent for Java 17, Spring, and MCP projects. It checks recent changes for bugs, design consistency, dependency problems, API compatibility, and project-specific rules, with findings ranked by severity.
dependency-manager
Dependency management, version upgrades, and compatibility specialist.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.